journal of the korean society of food science and nutrition | Journament

Journal Ranking

#5857 / 33,971
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
39
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 month ago

journal of the korean society of food science and nutrition

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus
Short Name journal of the korean society of food science and nutrition
Abbreviated Name journal of the korean society of food science and nutrition
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (83 total)

2013
erotica, sexuality and old age in a geriatric institution
;Margarita Murgieri
Vol. 16 , pp. 173-183
556 views Abstract
2015
reduced blood pressure and abdominal circumference and improves functional capacity of older hypertensive submitted functional physical therapy program
;Camila Gimenes;Eduardo Aguilar Arca;Marina Antônio Paulino;Nathália Valêncio Nicolau;Bianca Buitoni;Tauane Perez Pontes;Bruno Martinelli;Silvia Regina Barrile
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 77-92
309 views Abstract
2014
the elderly and the seicho no ie
;Thuam Silva Rodrigues;Flamínia Manzano Moreira Lodovici;Elisabeth Frohlich Mercadante
Vol. 17 , No. 1 , pp. 321-335
296 views Abstract
2015
qualidade de vida de idosos submetidos à hemodiálise: uma revisão sistemática
;Fabrícia Silvino Machado;Lucy Gomes Vianna;Karla Helena Coelho Vilaça;Maria Liz Cunha de Oliveira;Vicente Faleiros;Clayton Franco Moraes
Vol. 17 , No. 3 , pp. 149-163
291 views Abstract
2014
percepção da autonomia de idosos longevos e sua relação com fatores sociodemográficos e funcionais
;Juliana Hotta Ansai;Celisa Tiemi Nakagawa Sera
Vol. 16 , No. 3 , pp. 189-200
288 views Abstract
2013
aging processes in portugal. time use, social networks and living conditions
;Wilson José Alves Pedro
Vol. 16 , No. 2 , pp. 331-334
283 views Abstract
2017
Quality characteristics and antioxidant activities of aged black chestnut inner shells
Kim J.
Vol. 46 , pp. 343-349
277 views DOI
2013
fundo nacional do idoso: um instrumento de fortalecimento dos conselhos e de garantia de direitos da pessoa idosa
;Alexandre de Oliveira Alcântara;Karla Cristina Giacomin
Vol. 16 , No. 1 , pp. 143-166
277 views Abstract
2014
Effects of chestnut inner shell powder on antioxidant activities and quality characteristics of pork patties
Joo S.
Vol. 43 , pp. 698-704
275 views DOI
2017
Development of cereal product containing γ-aminobutyric acid producing lactic acid bacteria using electrostatic spray technology
Jeong, J.
Vol. 46 , pp. 979-985
267 views DOI
View All 83 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
39
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

39.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.