Indexed in Journament

journal of the korean society of food science and nutrition

EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
30.4 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #16,991 of 29,298 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
83 Articles
Scores higher than 42% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name journal of the korean society of food science and nutrition
Abbreviated Name journal of the korean society of food science and nutrition

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.9
Timeliness 0.0
Diversity 5.6
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 5.7
Content Distribution 66.7
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.9 30.4
Accessibility — 22.5
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 5.6 22.7
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 5.7 4.2
Content Distribution 66.7 88.7
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (83)

2013
erotica, sexuality and old age in a geriatric institution
;Margarita Murgieri
Vol. 16 , pp. 173-183
601 views Abstract
2015
reduced blood pressure and abdominal circumference and improves functional capacity of older hypertensive submitted functional physical therapy program
;Camila Gimenes;Eduardo Aguilar Arca;Marina Antônio Paulino;Nathália Valêncio Nicolau;Bianca Buitoni;Tauane Perez Pontes;Bruno Martinelli;Silvia Regina Barrile
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 77-92
365 views Abstract
2014
the elderly and the seicho no ie
;Thuam Silva Rodrigues;Flamínia Manzano Moreira Lodovici;Elisabeth Frohlich Mercadante
Vol. 17 , No. 1 , pp. 321-335
332 views Abstract
2014
percepção da autonomia de idosos longevos e sua relação com fatores sociodemográficos e funcionais
;Juliana Hotta Ansai;Celisa Tiemi Nakagawa Sera
Vol. 16 , No. 3 , pp. 189-200
323 views Abstract
2015
qualidade de vida de idosos submetidos à hemodiálise: uma revisão sistemática
;Fabrícia Silvino Machado;Lucy Gomes Vianna;Karla Helena Coelho Vilaça;Maria Liz Cunha de Oliveira;Vicente Faleiros;Clayton Franco Moraes
Vol. 17 , No. 3 , pp. 149-163
320 views Abstract
2014
Effects of chestnut inner shell powder on antioxidant activities and quality characteristics of pork patties
Joo S.
Vol. 43 , pp. 698-704
310 views DOI
2012
gerontological education: brief intervention in a social-daycare center for seniors and their impacts over professionals.
;Paula Giovanna Mesquita Bissoli;Meire Cachioni
Vol. 14 , No. 3 , pp. 143-164
307 views Abstract
2017
Quality characteristics and antioxidant activities of aged black chestnut inner shells
Kim J.
Vol. 46 , pp. 343-349
303 views DOI
2013
aging processes in portugal. time use, social networks and living conditions
;Wilson José Alves Pedro
Vol. 16 , No. 2 , pp. 331-334
298 views Abstract
2013
fundo nacional do idoso: um instrumento de fortalecimento dos conselhos e de garantia de direitos da pessoa idosa
;Alexandre de Oliveira Alcântara;Karla Cristina Giacomin
Vol. 16 , No. 1 , pp. 143-166
298 views Abstract
2017
Development of cereal product containing γ-aminobutyric acid producing lactic acid bacteria using electrostatic spray technology
Jeong, J.
Vol. 46 , pp. 979-985
291 views DOI
2017
Antioxidant activities and quality characteristics of cookies added with aged black chestnut inner shell
Son E.
Vol. 46 , pp. 202-209
253 views DOI
2017
Quality characteristics and antioxidant activities of aged black chestnut inner shells
Kim J.
Vol. 46 , pp. 343-349
303 views DOI
2016
caring for the elderly in hospital and home care: what's different?
;Fernanda Bueno D’Elboux Couto
Vol. 18 , No. 19 , pp. 57-76
163 views Abstract
2016
o cuidado de idosos em instituições de longa permanência e em centros-dia
;Maria Rosane de Souza Sério de Quadros;Wanda Pereira Patrocinio
Vol. 18 , No. 19 , pp. 77-97
263 views Abstract
2015
cuidar de idosos numa ilpi na perspectiva de cuidadoras formais
;Mariana Pedroza Silva;Deusivania Vieira da Silva Falcão
Vol. 17 , No. 3 , pp. 111-131
215 views Abstract
2015
experiences of aging on the beach environment
;Otávio Tavares;Vivian Silveira
Vol. 17 , No. 3 , pp. 271-284
200 views Abstract
2015
memórias de velhos: rememorando a trajetória de vida e a sociabilidade nas relações familiares.
;Janaína Carvalho Barros;Myriam Moraes Lins de Barros
Vol. 17 , No. 4 , pp. 337-358
258 views Abstract
2015
percepção de envelhecimento de adolescentes praticantes e não praticantes de exercício físico fora do ambiente escolar
;Gabriel de Aguiar Antunes;Inês Amanda Streit;Enaiane Cristina Menezes;Gelcemar Oliveira Farias;Giovana Zarpellon Mazo
Vol. 17 , No. 4 , pp. 261-274
248 views Abstract
2015
uma nova forma de comunicação para o cidadão sénior: facebook.
;Gina Maria Gouveia Páscoa;Henrique Manuel Pires Teixeira Gil
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 09-29
277 views Abstract
Journament Score
30.4/100 · Poor
Ranked #16,991 of 29,298 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

30.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

5.7/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

66.7/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.