chemical biology and drug design | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2649 / 33,953
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.3/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
38
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

chemical biology and drug design

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus
Short Name chemical biology and drug design
Abbreviated Name chemical biology and drug design
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (75 total)

2001
jubilaciones por invalidez y su relación con el sexo
;Guillermo López Espinosa;Grisell Aparicio Manresa;Isis Yeras Alós;Irina Hernández Cabrera
Vol. 17 , No. 5 , pp. 473-478
465 views Abstract
2010
bosquejo histórico sobre las principales teorías de la motivación y su influencia en el proceso de enseñanza-aprendizaje historical rough outline on the main theories of motivations and its influence on teaching-learning process
;Aliocha Batista Silva;Maydel Gálvez Espinos;Iliana Hinojosa Cueto
Vol. 26 , No. 2 , pp. 0-
379 views Abstract
2001
la economía de la salud, la eficiencia y el costo de oportunidad
;Alberto Baly Gil;María Eugenia Toledo;Félix Rodríguez Jústiz
Vol. 17 , No. 4 , pp. 395-398
357 views Abstract
1998
características biopsicosociales de los ancianos de 2 consultorios del policlínico california
;Regla Ledia González Sánchez;Eliana Fernández Torrente;Rosario Rodríguez Sánchez;Mayda Romero Guardes
Vol. 14 , No. 1 , pp. 38-42
347 views Abstract
2003
propuesta de modelo para la transferencia de pacientes en el sistema de salud cubano
;Félix J. Sansó Soberats;Cristina Valdivia Onega;Alcidez Lorenzo Rodríguez
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 0-
326 views Abstract
1998
factores asociados con la aparición de disfunciones sexuales en una población femenina
;Wilfredo Guibert Reyes;Marianela Prendes Labrada;Orquídea Portuondo Vicente
Vol. 14 , No. 1 , pp. 15-21
323 views Abstract
2003
prevalencia de baja visión y ceguera en un área de salud
;Lisis Osorio Illas;Dora L. Hitchman Barada;Juan Alberto Pérez Pérez;Carmen Padilla González
Vol. 19 , No. 5 , pp. 0-
308 views Abstract
2017
Design, synthesis and in vitro antiplasmodial activity of some bisquinolines against chloroquine-resistant strain
Kondaparla, S.
Vol. 89 , pp. 901-906
301 views DOI
2000
conocimientos de los médicos de familia sobre grupos de riesgo de enfermedades de transmisión sexual
;Denis Berdasquera Corcho
Vol. 16 , No. 6 , pp. 564-567
293 views Abstract
2005
comportamiento ante el alcohol de los estudiantes en las etapas de la adolescencia behavior of the students in relation to alcohol during the adolescence stages
;Wilfredo Guibert Reyes;Ivonne Gutiérrez Díaz;Cristóbal Martínez Gómez
Vol. 21 , No. 1-2 , pp. 0-
279 views Abstract
View All 75 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
38
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

37.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.