methods in molecular biology (clifton, nj) | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2357 / 33,971
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 month ago

methods in molecular biology (clifton, nj)

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi
Short Name methods mol biol
Abbreviated Name methods mol biol
ISSN 1940-6029
Aim and Scope
URL http://www.springer.com/series/7651
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (139 total)

2013
Computational prediction of lysine acetylation proteome-wide.
Basu, Amrita;
Vol. 981 , pp. 127-36
482 views DOI Abstract
2017
Predicting Post-Translational Modifications from Local Sequence Fragments Using Machine Learning Algorithms: Overview and Best Practices.
Tatjewski, Marcin;Kierczak, Marcin;Plewczynski, Dariusz;
Vol. 1484 , pp. 275-300
443 views DOI Abstract
2020
Application of Metabolomics to Renal and Cardiometabolic Diseases.
Rebholz, Casey M;Rhee, Eugene P;
Vol. 2104 , pp. 401-417
434 views DOI Abstract
2020
De Novo Molecular Formula Annotation and Structure Elucidation Using SIRIUS 4.
Ludwig, Marcus;Fleischauer, Markus;Dührkop, Kai;Hoffmann, Martin A;Böcker, Sebastian;
Vol. 2104 , pp. 185-207
426 views DOI Abstract
2019
How to Develop a Drug Target Ontology: KNowledge Acquisition and Representation Methodology (KNARM).
Küçük McGinty, Hande;Visser, Ubbo;Schürer, Stephan;
Vol. 1939 , pp. 49-69
421 views DOI Abstract
2020
A Workflow for the Identification of Mycotoxin Metabolites Using Liquid Chromatography-Ion Mobility-Mass Spectrometry.
Righetti, Laura;Dall'Asta, Chiara;
Vol. 2084 , pp. 133-144
411 views DOI Abstract
2019
Fluorine-18 Labeling of S100 Proteins for Small Animal Positron Emission Tomography.
Laube, Markus;Kniess, Torsten;Neuber, Christin;Haase-Kohn, Cathleen;Pietzsch, Jens;
Vol. 1929 , pp. 461-485
399 views DOI Abstract
2018
Multicolored Prestained Standard Protein Marker Generation Using a Variety of Remazol Dyes for Easy Visualization of Protein Bands During SDS-PAGE.
Kumar, Gaurav;
Vol. 1853 , pp. 19-25
391 views DOI Abstract
2014
comparison of the effects of magnesium sulphate and dexmedetomidine on surgical vision quality in endoscopic sinus surgery: randomized clinical study
;Akcan Akkaya;Umit Yasar Tekelioglu;Abdullah Demirhan;Murat Bilgi;Isa Yildiz;Tayfun Apuhan;Hasan Kocoglu
Vol. 64 , No. 6 , pp. 406-412
391 views DOI Abstract
2018
Cryopreservation of Pineapple Shoot Tips by the Droplet Vitrification Technique.
Souza, Fernanda Vidigal Duarte;de Souza, Everton Hilo;Kaya, Ergun;de Jesus Vieira, Lívia;da Silva, Ronilze Leite;
Vol. 1815 , pp. 269-277
382 views DOI Abstract
View All 139 Articles
42
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.8/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.