Conformational Searching with Quantum Mechanics.
Clicks: 330
ID: 91402
2020
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
68.1
/100
330 views
208 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #38 of 139 articles by views in methods in molecular biology (clifton, nj)
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 139 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Estimating the range of three-dimensional structures (conformations) that are available to a molecule is a key component of computer-aided drug design. Quantum mechanical simulation offers improved accuracy over forcefield methods, but at a high computational cost. The question is whether this increased cost can be justified in a context in which high-throughput analysis of large numbers of molecules is often key. This chapter discusses the application of quantum mechanics to conformational searching, with a focus on three key challenges: (1) the generation of ensembles that include a good approximation to a molecule's bioactive conformation at as prominent a ranking as possible; (2) rational analysis and modification of a pre-established bioactive conformation in terms of its energetics; and (3) approximation of real solution-phase conformational ensembles in tandem with NMR data. The impact of QM on the high-throughput application (1) is debatable, meaning that for the moment its primary application is still lower-throughput applications such as (2) and (3). The optimal choice of QM method is also discussed. Rigorous benchmarking suggests that DFT methods are only acceptable when used with large basis sets, but a trickle of papers continue to obtain useful results with relatively low-cost methods, leading to a dilemma that the literature has yet to fully resolve.
| Reference Key |
habgood2020conformationalmethods
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Habgood, Matthew;James, Tim;Heifetz, Alexander; |
| Journal | methods in molecular biology (clifton, nj) |
| Year | 2020 |
| DOI |
10.1007/978-1-0716-0282-9_14
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.