journal of nanostructures | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2150 / 33,939
📉 Poor
Overall Score
37.5/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

journal of nanostructures

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus doaj
Short Name journal of nanostructures
Abbreviated Name journal of nanostructures
ISSN 2251-7871
Aim and Scope
URL http://jns.kashanu.ac.ir
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (57 total)

2015
Hybrid Organometallic-Inorganic Nanomaterial: Acetyl Ferrocene Schiff base Immobilized on Silica Coated Magnetite Nanoparticles
Masteri-Farahani, M.;Adegozali, S.;Matin, A.;
Vol. 5 , No. 4 , pp. 337-344
367 views Abstract
2020
A green chemistry approach for facile synthesis of functionalized boron nitride nanosheets
Rafiei-Sarmazdeh, Z.
Vol. 10 , pp. 64-75
361 views DOI
2009
pedagogos(as) de crianças e pensadores críticos da educação / pedagogue(s) of children and critical thinkers of education
;Euclides Redin
Vol. 17 , No. 2 , pp. 142-151
283 views Abstract
2020
o currículo e a produção das identidades/diferençasde crianças indígenas em espaço escolar
;Carlos Magno Naglis Vieira;Adir Casaro Nascimento;Antônio Hilário Aguilera Urquiza
Vol. 28 , No. 1 , pp. 21-33
276 views DOI Abstract
2011
Nanocrystalline copper(II) oxide-catalyzed one-pot four- component synthesis of polyhydroquinoline derivativesunder solvent-free conditions
Safaei-Ghomi, J.;Ghasemzadeh, M. A.;
Vol. 1 , No. 3 , pp. 243-248
271 views Abstract
2009
a universidade e a formação de seus docentes: alguns apontamentos / the university and the development of its teachers: some notes
;Maura Maria Morita Vasconcellos
Vol. 17 , No. 2 , pp. 164-180
271 views Abstract
2011
competencias tic en la formación inicial docente: estudio descriptivo para la toma de decisiones en el currículum
;Pedro Rodrigo Sandoval Rubilar;Francisco Rodriguez Alveal;Ana Maldonado Fuentes
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 271-295
269 views Abstract
2015
linguagem como prÁtica social: o blog como espaÇo de interaÇÃo e colaboraÇÃo
;Elena Maria Mallmann;Sabrina Bagetti;Juliana Sales Jacques;Iris Cristina Datsch Toebe
Vol. 23 , No. 1 , pp. 348-370
257 views DOI Abstract
2016
nanoparticle of faith on nurses interventions
;Paula Soares Encarnação;Clara Costa Oliveira;Teresa Martins;Clara Costa Oliveira
Vol. 24 , No. 2 , pp. 24-39
228 views DOI Abstract
2015
Sulfated Titania Nanoparticles: an Efficient Catalyst for the Synthesis of Polyhydroquinoline Derivatives through Hantzsch Multicomponent Reaction
Tadjarodi, A.;Azad, A.;Dekamin, M. G.;Afshar, S.;Hejazi, R.;Mollahosseini, A.;
Vol. 5 , No. 4 , pp. 327-335
206 views Abstract
View All 57 Articles
37
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.