Stem cell research | Journament

Journal Ranking

#3177 / 33,959
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.9/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

Stem cell research

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name Stem Cell Res
Abbreviated Name stem cell res
ISSN 1876-7753
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/stem-cell-research
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (38 total)

2020
Generation of two LRRK2 homozygous knockout human induced pluripotent stem cell lines using CRISPR/Cas9.
Chen, Shuhan;Luo, Zhiwei;Ward, Carl;Ibañez, David P;Liu, Hao;Zhong, Xiaofen;Sharma, Narendra K;Qin, Baoming;Fan, Wenxia;Wang, Dongye;
Vol. 45 , pp. 101804
419 views DOI Abstract
2014
the portrait of a good foreign language teacher: a cross-interview analysis of private language course administrators’ opinions
;Şakire Erbay;Elif Erdem;Hasan Sağlamel
Vol. 5 , No. 4 , pp. 41-61
396 views DOI Abstract
2020
Derivation of two iPSC lines from a sporadic ASD patient (NUIGi033-A) and a paternal control (NUIGi034-A).
de la Cruz, Berta Marcó;Ding, Yicheng;McInerney, Veronica;Krawczyk, Janusz;Lu, Yin;Yang, Guangming;Qian, Xiaohong;Li, Weidong;Howard, Linda;Allen, Nicholas M;O'Brien, Timothy;Gallagher, Louise;Shen, Sanbing;
Vol. 44 , pp. 101722
358 views DOI Abstract
2019
Generation of three induced pluripotent stem cell lines from postmortem tissue derived following sudden death of a young patient with STXBP1 mutation.
Yamamoto, Takuma;Otsu, Makoto;Okumura, Takashi;Horie, Yumi;Ueno, Yasuharu;Taniguchi, Hideki;Ohtaka, Manami;Nakanishi, Mahito;Abe, Yuki;Murase, Takehiko;Umehara, Takahiro;Ikematsu, Kazuya;
Vol. 39 , pp. 101485
349 views DOI Abstract
2018
Generation of integration-free iPS cell lines from three sickle cell disease patients from the state of Bahia, Brazil
Martins, Gabriele Louise Soares;Paredes, Bruno Diaz;Azevedo, Carine Machado;Sampaio, Gabriela Louise De Almeida;Nonaka, Carolina Kymie Vasques;Cavalcante, Bruno Raphael Ribeiro;Silva, Katia Nunes Da;Pereira, Ciro Silveira E.;Soares, Milena Botelho Pereira;Santos, Ricardo Ribeiro Dos;Souza, Bruno Solano De Freitas;
Vol. 33 , pp. 10-14
346 views Abstract
2020
Establishment of SIAISi002-A, an induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) line from 39-year old healthy female donor with a family history of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and two copies of APOE4 gene.
Yan, Yi;Qiu, Yinghui;Zhao, Aonan;Zhao, Jian;Wang, Ying;Deng, Yulei;
Vol. 45 , pp. 101792
341 views DOI Abstract
2019
Generation of three control iPS cell lines for sickle cell disease studies by reprogramming erythroblasts from individuals without hemoglobinopathies.
Paredes, Bruno Diaz;Martins, Gabriele Louise Soares;Azevedo, Carine Machado;Sampaio, Gabriela Louise de Almeida;Nonaka, Carolina Kymie Vasques;Silva, Katia Nunes da;Soares, Milena Botelho Pereira;Santos, Ricardo Ribeiro Dos;Souza, Bruno Solano de Freitas;
Vol. 38 , pp. 101454
341 views DOI Abstract
2019
Chorionic and amniotic membrane-derived stem cells have distinct, and gestational diabetes mellitus independent, proliferative, differentiation, and immunomodulatory capacities
Chen, L.
Vol. 40 , pp. 0-0
336 views DOI
2019
Improved methods for the differentiation of hypothalamic vasopressin neurons using mouse induced pluripotent stem cells.
Mitsumoto, Kazuki;Suga, Hidetaka;Sakakibara, Mayu;Soen, Mika;Yamada, Tomiko;Ozaki, Hajime;Nagai, Takashi;Kano, Mayuko;Kasai, Takatoshi;Ozone, Chikafumi;Ogawa, Koichiro;Sugiyama, Mariko;Onoue, Takeshi;Tsunekawa, Taku;Takagi, Hiroshi;Hagiwara, Daisuke;Ito, Yoshihiro;Iwama, Shintaro;Goto, Motomitsu;Banno, Ryoichi;Arima, Hiroshi;
Vol. 40 , pp. 101572
324 views DOI Abstract
2019
Mesenchymal stem cells preserve their stem cell traits after exposure to antimetabolite chemotherapy.
Lopez Perez, Ramon;Münz, Franziska;Vidoni, Denise;Rühle, Alexander;Trinh, Thuy;Sisombath, Sonevisay;Zou, Bingwen;Wuchter, Patrick;Debus, Jürgen;Grosu, Anca-Ligia;Saffrich, Rainer;Huber, Peter E;Nicolay, Nils H;
Vol. 40 , pp. 101536
324 views DOI Abstract
View All 38 Articles
40
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.