Indexed in Journament

therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease

ISSN 1759-720X· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
34.4/100
Journament Score
#12,378
Journament Rank
86
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name ther adv musculoskelet dis
Abbreviated Name ther adv musculoskelet dis
ISSN 1759-720X
URL https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/journal/therapeutic-advances-musculoskeletal-disease

Indexings

ncbi ulakbim sci

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (86)

2019
Therapeutic approaches to osteosarcopenia: insights for the clinician.
Vol. 11 , pp. 1759720X19867009
400 views DOI Abstract
2019
Functional risk for fracture by safe functional motion testing: a short version of the safe functional motion test.
Vol. 11 , pp. 1759720X19856012
372 views DOI Abstract
2019
Treat-to-target strategy for knee osteoarthritis. International technical expert panel consensus and good clinical practice statements.
Vol. 11 , pp. 1759720X19893800
366 views DOI Abstract
2011
a linguagem tÉcnica da economia
, pp. -
307 views Abstract
2016
2015
nos entremeios da diversidade de gêneros textuais e de textos na escola, a formação do sujeito leitor
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 56-65
230 views Abstract
2014
a informática como potencializadora da inclusão digital e da aprendizagem nos anos iniciais do ensino fundamental
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 54-63
229 views Abstract
2014
percepção ambiental através da prática pedagógica no ensino de jovens e adultos
Vol. 5 , No. 4 , pp. 46-55
220 views Abstract
2019
Treat-to-target strategy for knee osteoarthritis. International technical expert panel consensus and good clinical practice statements.
Vol. 11 , pp. 1759720X19893800
366 views DOI Abstract
2019
Therapeutic approaches to osteosarcopenia: insights for the clinician.
Vol. 11 , pp. 1759720X19867009
400 views DOI Abstract
2019
Functional risk for fracture by safe functional motion testing: a short version of the safe functional motion test.
Vol. 11 , pp. 1759720X19856012
372 views DOI Abstract
2016
a importância da afetividade nas relações pedagógicas da educação infantil
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. 486-497
23 views Abstract
2016
“agora posso ler”: elas na educação de jovens e adultos
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. 215-228
38 views Abstract
2016
mitos y desafíos para la universidad latinoamericana
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 18-36
35 views Abstract
2016
a música no desenvolvimento sócio-afetivo de crianças com síndrome de down na pré-escola
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. 441-453
24 views Abstract
2016
as condições do trabalho do docente em uma escola pública de sinop - mato grosso
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. 371-385
113 views Abstract
2016
introdução
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. 199-214
15 views
2016
o programa mais educação: um olhar sobre a concepção dos alunos
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. 568-583
23 views Abstract
34
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

34.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.