therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease | Journament

Journal Ranking

#522 / 33,784
📉 Poor
Overall Score
32.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 4 hours ago

therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name ther adv musculoskelet dis
Abbreviated Name ther adv musculoskelet dis
ISSN 1759-720X
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (86 total)

2019
Functional risk for fracture by safe functional motion testing: a short version of the safe functional motion test.
Recknor, Christopher P;Van Dussen, Daniel;MacIntyre, Norma;Recknor, Julie;
Vol. 11 , pp. 1759720X19856012
318 views DOI Abstract
2019
Therapeutic approaches to osteosarcopenia: insights for the clinician.
Fatima, Mizhgan;Brennan-Olsen, Sharon L;Duque, Gustavo;
Vol. 11 , pp. 1759720X19867009
311 views DOI Abstract
2019
Treat-to-target strategy for knee osteoarthritis. International technical expert panel consensus and good clinical practice statements.
Migliore, Alberto;Gigliucci, Gianfranco;Alekseeva, Liudmila;Avasthi, Sachin;Bannuru, Raveendhara R;Chevalier, Xavier;Conrozier, Thierry;Crimaldi, Sergio;Damjanov, Nemanja;de Campos, Gustavo Constantino;Diracoglu, Demirhan;Herrero-Beaumont, Gabriel;Iolascon, Giovanni;Ionescu, Ruxandra;Isailovic, Natasa;Jerosch, Jörg;Lains, Jorge;Maheu, Emmanuel;Makri, Souzi;Martusevich, Natalia;Matucci Cerinc, Marco;Micu, Mihaela;Pavelka, Karel;Petrella, Robert J;Tarantino, Umberto;Raman, Raghu;
Vol. 11 , pp. 1759720X19893800
290 views DOI Abstract
2011
a linguagem tÉcnica da economia
;Tânia Pitombo de Oliveira
, pp. -
266 views Abstract
2011
língua portuguesa e literatura: relatório de experiência de estágio supervisionado na escola estadual nilza de oliveira pipino
;Fernando Hélio Tavares de Barros
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. -
205 views Abstract
2016
o programa institucional de bolsa de iniciação à docência para a formação do pedagogo: necessidades de novas práticas pedagógicas
;Antonia Jhonnayldy Sousa da Silva Bessa
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. 275-289
191 views Abstract
2014
a informática como potencializadora da inclusão digital e da aprendizagem nos anos iniciais do ensino fundamental
;Bernadete Lourdes de Sousa;Adil Antônio Alves de Oliveira
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 54-63
191 views Abstract
2015
motivado a ser cientista: professor de química e fazeres associados aos diferentes usos das tecnologias de informação e comunicação - uma entrevista com francislê neri de souza
;Maria Elizabete Rambo Kochhann
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 163-168
178 views Abstract
2015
nos entremeios da diversidade de gêneros textuais e de textos na escola, a formação do sujeito leitor
;Michele Pereira de Oliveira;Cristinne Leus Tomé
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 56-65
170 views Abstract
2014
percepção ambiental através da prática pedagógica no ensino de jovens e adultos
;Laurete Maria de Souza;Edneuza Alves Trugillo
Vol. 5 , No. 4 , pp. 46-55
165 views Abstract
View All 86 Articles
33
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

32.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.