Indexed in Journament

the journal of deaf studies and deaf education

ISSN 1081-4159· EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
32.5 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #19,033 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
21 Articles
Scores higher than 35.1% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name the journal of deaf studies and deaf education
Abbreviated Name j deaf stud deaf educ
ISSN 1081-4159

Quality Profile

5 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.5
Timeliness 70.0
Innovation 1.5
Community Impact 6.4
Content Distribution 48.0
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

7 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 5 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.5 30.1
Accessibility — 17.9
Timeliness 70.0 19.2
Diversity — 28.8
Innovation 1.5 31.2
Community Impact 6.4 13.4
Content Distribution 48.0 88.4
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (21)

2016
Health Care Access Among Deaf People
Kuenburg, Alexa;Fellinger, Paul;Fellinger, Johannes;
Vol. 21 , No. 1 , pp. 1-10
362 views Abstract
2006
Parental Resources, Parental Stress, and Socioemotional Development of Deaf and Hard of Hearing Children
Hintermair, Manfred;
Vol. 11 , No. 4 , pp. 493-513
266 views Abstract
2009
Spoken Language Scores of Children Using Cochlear Implants Compared to Hearing Age-Mates at School Entry
Geers, Ann E.;Moog, Jean S.;Biedenstein, Julia;Brenner, Christine;Hayes, Heather;
Vol. 14 , No. 3 , pp. 371-385
229 views Abstract
2006
Concurrent Correlates and Predictors of Reading and Spelling Achievement in Deaf and Hearing School Children
Kyle, Fiona E.;Harris, Margaret;
Vol. 11 , No. 3 , pp. 273-288
204 views Abstract
2012
Modifying the Classroom Environment to Increase Engagement and Decrease Disruption with Students Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing
Guardino, Caroline;Antia, Shirind D.;
Vol. 17 , No. 4 , pp. 518-533
200 views Abstract
2012
Large-Scale Academic Achievement Testing of Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Students: Past, Present, and Future
Qi, Sen;Mitchell, Ross E.;
Vol. 17 , No. 1 , pp. 1-18
192 views Abstract
2013
Deafblind People, Communication, Independence, and Isolation
Hersh, Marion;
Vol. 18 , No. 4 , pp. 446-463
169 views Abstract
2011
Reading Achievement in Relation to Phonological Coding and Awareness in Deaf Readers: A Meta-analysis
Mayberry, Rachel I.;del Giudice, Alex A.;Lieberman, Amy M.;
Vol. 16 , No. 2 , pp. 164-188
166 views Abstract
The Evidence-Based Sexual Abuse Prevention Program: Strong With Sam
Urbann, Katharina;Bienstein, Pia;Kaul, Thomas;
, pp. -
160 views Abstract
Goodnight Gorilla: Deaf Student American Sign Language Narrative Renditions After Viewing a Model
Beal, Jennifer S;Scott, Jessica A;Spell, Kelly;
, pp. -
158 views Abstract
2026
Effects of the preventive hypertension self-management education program for deaf and hard of hearing adults: a randomized controlled trial
Yujin Park, Y. Kim, Gi Won Choi, Ha Na Jeong, Hee Jung Kim, Sun Ju Chang
18 views DOI Abstract
2026
Moving beyond placement: a comparison of special and mainstream school inclusiveness for deaf and hard-of-hearing students
Hatice Yildirim, Ahmet Kuscuoglu
23 views DOI Abstract
2026
Program evaluation of a multiparty communication intervention supporting people with congenital deafblindness
Mijkje Worm, Saskia Damen, Marleen J. Janssen, Alexander Minnaert
13 views DOI Abstract
2026
Correction to: A Teacher Training Program: Early intervention for deaf/hard of hearing children
16 views DOI
2016
Health Care Access Among Deaf People
Kuenburg, Alexa;Fellinger, Paul;Fellinger, Johannes;
Vol. 21 , No. 1 , pp. 1-10
362 views Abstract
2013
Deafblind People, Communication, Independence, and Isolation
Hersh, Marion;
Vol. 18 , No. 4 , pp. 446-463
169 views Abstract
2012
Large-Scale Academic Achievement Testing of Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Students: Past, Present, and Future
Qi, Sen;Mitchell, Ross E.;
Vol. 17 , No. 1 , pp. 1-18
192 views Abstract
2012
Modifying the Classroom Environment to Increase Engagement and Decrease Disruption with Students Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing
Guardino, Caroline;Antia, Shirind D.;
Vol. 17 , No. 4 , pp. 518-533
200 views Abstract
2011
Reading Achievement in Relation to Phonological Coding and Awareness in Deaf Readers: A Meta-analysis
Mayberry, Rachel I.;del Giudice, Alex A.;Lieberman, Amy M.;
Vol. 16 , No. 2 , pp. 164-188
166 views Abstract
2009
Spoken Language Scores of Children Using Cochlear Implants Compared to Hearing Age-Mates at School Entry
Geers, Ann E.;Moog, Jean S.;Biedenstein, Julia;Brenner, Christine;Hayes, Heather;
Vol. 14 , No. 3 , pp. 371-385
229 views Abstract
Journament Score
32.5/100 · Poor
Ranked #19,033 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

32.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

1.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

6.4/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

70.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

48.0/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.