Indexed in Journament

american statistician

ISSN 0003-1305· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
16.1 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #29,263 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
25 Articles
Scores higher than 0.1% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name american statistician
Abbreviated Name american statistician
ISSN 0003-1305
URL http://www.tandfonline.com/action/aboutThisJournal?journalCode=utas20

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.6 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 20.4
Timeliness 0.0 5.8
Diversity 5.6 24.4
Innovation 19.5 25.7
Community Impact 2.9 5.8
Content Distribution 26.5 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (25)

2009
desapropriação de propriedade rural produtiva para fins de reforma agrária: efetivação de direitos fundamentais a partir de uma perspectiva ambiental constitucional fundada na justiça social
;Talita Thomaz Vieira
, No. 5 , pp. 83-100
556 views DOI Abstract
2015
the metaphorical legal speech and the rhetorical construction of truth in law
;Pedro Parini
Vol. 16 , No. 1 , pp. 11-46
301 views DOI Abstract
2016
educação do campo é direito e não esmola! um olhar constitucional sobre o direito fundamental de crianças e adolescentes à educação do campo
;Mariana Barbosa de Souza;João Paulo Reis Costa;Virgínia Elisabeta Etges
Vol. 17 , No. 2 , pp. 431-464
272 views DOI Abstract
2019
An Examination of Discrepancies in Multiple Imputation Procedures Between SAS® and SPSS®
Wang, J.
Vol. 73 , pp. 80-88
271 views DOI
2009
um ensaio sobre o liberalismo político de john rawls: construtivismo e razão pública
;Marcelo Andrade Cattoni de Oliveira
, No. 7 , pp. 79-94
258 views DOI Abstract
2012
o positivismo jurídico e sua evolução como pensamento: um histórico de sucesso ou de fracasso?
;Daniel Dix Carneiro
, No. 9 , pp. 105-142
218 views DOI Abstract
2017
law enforcement and the project of descent of the symbolic order
;Aldacy Rachid Coutinho
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 89-112
197 views DOI Abstract
2007
o caráter fenomênico do discurso retórico: o papel do ceticismo pirrônico no direito em frente às recentes teorias da argumentação jurídicas
;Pedro Parini Marques de Lima
, No. 2 , pp. 41-68
179 views DOI Abstract
2009
jurisdição trabalhista democrática: a construção do provimento jurisdicional, a partir dos anseios da sociedade e a intervenção do amicus curiae no direito processual do trabalho, importa em promoção de justiça social
;Vitor Salino de Moura Eça;Aline Carneiro Magalhães
, No. 5 , pp. 13-36
169 views DOI Abstract
2009
a justiça de transição e a reparação de danos no brasil: a necessidade de consideração dos danos morais na fixação do quantum indenizatório
;Bruno Ribeiro Machado
, No. 5 , pp. 121-150
150 views DOI Abstract
2019
An Examination of Discrepancies in Multiple Imputation Procedures Between SAS® and SPSS®
Wang, J.
Vol. 73 , pp. 80-88
271 views DOI
2017
law enforcement and the project of descent of the symbolic order
;Aldacy Rachid Coutinho
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 89-112
197 views DOI Abstract
2016
faces of new constitutionalism: challenges for effective the constitution in informational society
;Marília Do Nascimento Pereira;Valéria Ribas Do Nascimento
Vol. 17 , No. 1 , pp. 249-267
78 views DOI Abstract
2016
expediente
;Elda Coelho de Azevedo Bussinguer
Vol. 15 , No. 2 , pp. 1-14
19 views DOI
2016
educação do campo é direito e não esmola! um olhar constitucional sobre o direito fundamental de crianças e adolescentes à educação do campo
;Mariana Barbosa de Souza;João Paulo Reis Costa;Virgínia Elisabeta Etges
Vol. 17 , No. 2 , pp. 431-464
272 views DOI Abstract
2015
brief notes on the dogmatic of the existential minimum in brazilian law
;Ingo Wolfgang Sarlet;Taís Hemann da Rosa
Vol. 16 , No. 1 , pp. 217-248
34 views DOI Abstract
2015
the metaphorical legal speech and the rhetorical construction of truth in law
;Pedro Parini
Vol. 16 , No. 1 , pp. 11-46
301 views DOI Abstract
2015
essay concerning new philosophical questions collected from the law
;Alberto Artosi
Vol. 16 , No. 1 , pp. 61-73
27 views DOI Abstract
2014
protección del derecho a la inviolabilidad del domicilio y las perturbaciones acústicas
;Pilar Domínguez Martinez
, No. 13 , pp. 351-373
17 views DOI Abstract
2013
a genuína contribuição da ciência do direito para um discurso interdisciplinar
;Stephan Kirste
, No. 12 , pp. 13-28
71 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
16.1/100 · Poor
Ranked #29,263 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

16.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

19.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

2.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

26.5/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.