essay concerning new philosophical questions collected from the law
Clicks: 21
ID: 200018
2015
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
6.0
/100
21 views
4 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #17 of 25 articles by views in american statistician
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
This article is intended as an homage to Leibniz and his Specimen quaestionum
philosophicarum ex iure collectarum (“Specimen of Philosophical Questions Collected from the Law”). In this early writing Leibniz, then at the beginning of his career both as a philosopher and as a jurist, argues for his (at that time and probably also now) bold thesis that the law lends itself spontaneously to philosophy on account of both its intrinsic philosophical content and the fact that “many places in the law would be an inextricable labyrinth without the guidance of philosophy”. In the wake of Leibniz’s claim, the article focuses on three legal norms: art. 1189 of the Italian Civil Code (payment to the seeming creditor); art. 47 of the Italian Penal Code (factual mistake), and art. 533 of the Italian Code of Criminal Procedure (reasonable doubt). Each article is subjected to philosophical analysis. The first article leads directly to the problem of the appearance/reality dichotomy. The last two articles rise the issue of our representation of reality and of the difference between possible doubt and reasonable doubt, respectively. In all three cases, some possible jurisprudential implications of the respective philosophical readings are suggested.
| Reference Key |
artosi2015revistaessay
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Alberto Artosi |
| Journal | american statistician |
| Year | 2015 |
| DOI |
10.18759/rdgf.v16i1.749
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.