Indexed in Journament

The Journal of clinical investigation

ISSN 0021-9738· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
47.2 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #353 of 29,297 scored journals (34,015 indexed)
74 Articles
Scores higher than 98.7% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

简称 J Clin Invest
缩写名称 j clin invest
ISSN 0021-9738
URL http://www.jci.org

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for The Journal of clinical investigation
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.0 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 23.1
Timeliness 60.0 3.0
Diversity 80.3 26.1
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 8.6 4.2
Content Distribution 52.0 89.2
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (74)

2003
Application of a mathematical model to prevent in vivo amplification of antibiotic-resistant bacterial populations during therapy
Vol. 112 , No. 2 , pp. -
573 views Abstract
1993
Epstein-Barr virus-infected T lymphocytes in Epstein-Barr virus-associated hemophagocytic syndrome
Vol. 92 , No. 3 , pp. -
551 views Abstract
1991
1997
Frequent genital herpes simplex virus 2 shedding in immunocompetent women. Effect of acyclovir treatment
Vol. 99 , No. 5 , pp. -
503 views Abstract
2005
Mice lacking ghrelin receptors resist the development of diet-induced obesity
Vol. 115 , No. 12 , pp. -
499 views Abstract
1997
Isoform 1c of sterol regulatory element binding protein is less active than isoform 1a in livers of transgenic mice and in cultured cells
Vol. 99 , No. 5 , pp. -
479 views Abstract
2019
Relief of tumor hypoxia unleashes the tumoricidal potential of neutrophils.
454 views DOI Abstract
1983
Transferable beta-lactamase. A new mechanism for in vitro penicillin resistance in Streptococcus faecalis
Vol. 72 , No. 3 , pp. -
453 views Abstract
2019
Identifying and targeting pathogenic PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in IL-6-blockade-refractory idiopathic multicentric Castleman disease.
Vol. 130
439 views DOI Abstract
2025
The complement system and kidney cancer: pathogenesis to clinical applications.
Vol. 135
80 views DOI Abstract
2025
Tebentafusp elicits on-target cutaneous immune responses driven by cytotoxic T-cells in uveal melanoma patients.
63 views DOI Abstract
2024
TWIST1+FAP+ fibroblasts in the pathogenesis of intestinal fibrosis in Crohn's disease.
118 views DOI Abstract
2021
Changes in the National Cancer Institute’s R01 workforce: growth, aging, retention, and policy implications
Vol. 131 , No. 7 , pp. -
124 views DOI
2020
2020
SSBP1 mutations cause mtDNA depletion underlying a complex optic atrophy disorder.
Vol. 130 , No. 1 , pp. 108-125
406 views DOI Abstract
2020
Chronic mTOR activation induces a degradative smooth muscle cell phenotype.
290 views DOI Abstract
2020
Prion protein glycans reduce intracerebral fibril formation and spongiosis in prion disease.
419 views DOI Abstract
2019
IFN-I response timing relative to virus replication determines MERS coronavirus infection outcomes
Vol. 129 , No. 9 , pp. 3625-3639
167 views DOI
Journament Score
47.2/100 · Below Average
Ranked #353 of 29,297 scored
(34,015 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

47.2/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

80.3/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

8.6/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

60.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

52.0/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.