Indexed in Journament

The Journal of clinical investigation

ISSN 0021-9738· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
39.5 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #8,989 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
74 Articles
Scores higher than 69.3% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

ชื่อย่อ J Clin Invest
ชื่อตัวย่อ j clin invest
ISSN 0021-9738
URL http://www.jci.org

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for The Journal of clinical investigation
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.3 30.1
Accessibility 20.0 17.9
Timeliness 60.0 19.2
Diversity 33.3 28.8
Innovation 70.0 31.2
Community Impact 7.9 13.4
Content Distribution 50.7 88.4
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (74)

2003
Application of a mathematical model to prevent in vivo amplification of antibiotic-resistant bacterial populations during therapy
Vol. 112 , No. 2 , pp. -
525 views Abstract
1993
Epstein-Barr virus-infected T lymphocytes in Epstein-Barr virus-associated hemophagocytic syndrome
Vol. 92 , No. 3 , pp. -
523 views Abstract
1991
1997
Frequent genital herpes simplex virus 2 shedding in immunocompetent women. Effect of acyclovir treatment
Vol. 99 , No. 5 , pp. -
482 views Abstract
2005
Mice lacking ghrelin receptors resist the development of diet-induced obesity
Vol. 115 , No. 12 , pp. -
472 views Abstract
1997
Isoform 1c of sterol regulatory element binding protein is less active than isoform 1a in livers of transgenic mice and in cultured cells
Vol. 99 , No. 5 , pp. -
451 views Abstract
2019
Relief of tumor hypoxia unleashes the tumoricidal potential of neutrophils.
425 views DOI Abstract
1983
Transferable beta-lactamase. A new mechanism for in vitro penicillin resistance in Streptococcus faecalis
Vol. 72 , No. 3 , pp. -
425 views Abstract
2019
Identifying and targeting pathogenic PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in IL-6-blockade-refractory idiopathic multicentric Castleman disease.
Vol. 130
412 views DOI Abstract
2025
The complement system and kidney cancer: pathogenesis to clinical applications.
Vol. 135
66 views DOI Abstract
2025
Tebentafusp elicits on-target cutaneous immune responses driven by cytotoxic T-cells in uveal melanoma patients.
44 views DOI Abstract
2024
TWIST1+FAP+ fibroblasts in the pathogenesis of intestinal fibrosis in Crohn's disease.
84 views DOI Abstract
2021
Changes in the National Cancer Institute’s R01 workforce: growth, aging, retention, and policy implications
Vol. 131 , No. 7 , pp. -
104 views DOI
2020
2020
SSBP1 mutations cause mtDNA depletion underlying a complex optic atrophy disorder.
Vol. 130 , No. 1 , pp. 108-125
384 views DOI Abstract
2020
Chronic mTOR activation induces a degradative smooth muscle cell phenotype.
267 views DOI Abstract
2020
Prion protein glycans reduce intracerebral fibril formation and spongiosis in prion disease.
402 views DOI Abstract
2019
IFN-I response timing relative to virus replication determines MERS coronavirus infection outcomes
Vol. 129 , No. 9 , pp. 3625-3639
146 views DOI
Journament Score
39.5/100 · Poor
Ranked #8,989 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

39.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

33.3/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

7.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

60.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

50.7/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.