The Journal of clinical investigation | Journament

Journal Ranking

#287 / 33,810
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.6/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
50
Community Impact
38
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 13 hours ago

The Journal of clinical investigation

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi
Short Name J Clin Invest
Abbreviated Name j clin invest
ISSN 0021-9738
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions
Added by Said Nadeem on Jul 03, 2019

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (74 total)

1993
Epstein-Barr virus-infected T lymphocytes in Epstein-Barr virus-associated hemophagocytic syndrome
Kawaguchi H;Miyashita T;Herbst H;Niedobitek G;Asada M;Tsuchida M;Hanada R;Kinoshita A;Sakurai M;Kobayashi N;;
Vol. 92 , No. 3 , pp. -
423 views Abstract
2003
Application of a mathematical model to prevent in vivo amplification of antibiotic-resistant bacterial populations during therapy
Jumbe N;Louie A;Leary R;Liu W;Deziel MR;Tam VH;Bachhawat R;Freeman C;Kahn JB;Bush K;Dudley MN;Miller MH;Drusano GL;;
Vol. 112 , No. 2 , pp. -
418 views Abstract
1991
Role of T lymphocyte subsets in the pathogenesis of primary infection and rechallenge with respiratory syncytial virus in mice
Graham BS;Bunton LA;Wright PF;Karzon DT;;
Vol. 88 , No. 3 , pp. -
396 views Abstract
2005
Mice lacking ghrelin receptors resist the development of diet-induced obesity
Zigman JM;Nakano Y;Coppari R;Balthasar N;Marcus JN;Lee CE;Jones JE;Deysher AE;Waxman AR;White RD;Williams TD;Lachey JL;Seeley RJ;Lowell BB;Elmquist JK;;
Vol. 115 , No. 12 , pp. -
390 views Abstract
1997
Frequent genital herpes simplex virus 2 shedding in immunocompetent women. Effect of acyclovir treatment
Wald A;Corey L;Cone R;Hobson A;Davis G;Zeh J;;
Vol. 99 , No. 5 , pp. -
381 views Abstract
1997
Isoform 1c of sterol regulatory element binding protein is less active than isoform 1a in livers of transgenic mice and in cultured cells
Shimano H;Horton JD;Shimomura I;Hammer RE;Brown MS;Goldstein JL;;
Vol. 99 , No. 5 , pp. -
360 views Abstract
2003
Oxidative stress, cell cycle, and neurodegeneration
Klein, Jeffrey A;Ackerman, Susan L
Vol. 111 , No. 6 , pp. 785-793
327 views
1983
Transferable beta-lactamase. A new mechanism for in vitro penicillin resistance in Streptococcus faecalis
Murray BE;Mederski-Samaroj B;;
Vol. 72 , No. 3 , pp. -
320 views Abstract
2019
Identifying and targeting pathogenic PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in IL-6-blockade-refractory idiopathic multicentric Castleman disease.
Fajgenbaum, David C;Langan, Ruth-Anne;Japp, Alberto Sada;Partridge, Helen L;Pierson, Sheila K;Singh, Amrit;Arenas, Daniel J;Ruth, Jason R;Nabel, Christopher S;Stone, Katie;Okumura, Mariko;Schwarer, Anthony;Jose, Fábio Freire;Hamerschlak, Nelson;Wertheim, Gerald B;Jordan, Michael B;Cohen, Adam D;Krymskaya, Vera;Rubenstein, Arthur;Betts, Michael R;Kambayashi, Taku;van Rhee, Frits;Uldrick, Thomas S;
Vol. 130
315 views DOI Abstract
2020
Underglycosylated prion protein modulates plaque formation in the brain.
Bartz, Jason C;
309 views DOI Abstract
View All 74 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
50
38
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

50.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

38.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.