FEMS microbiology letters | Journament

Journal Ranking

#131 / 33,950
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
43.1/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
65
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
40
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

FEMS microbiology letters

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name FEMS Microbiol Lett
Abbreviated Name fems microbiol lett
ISSN 1574-6968
Aim and Scope
URL https://academic.oup.com/femsle
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (177 total)

2019
Scientometric analysis of the term 'microbiota' in research publications (1999-2017): a second youth of a century-old concept.
Baudoin, Lesya;Sapinho, David;Maddi, Abdelghani;Miotti, Luis;
Vol. 366 , No. 12
449 views DOI Abstract
2019
Synbiotics impact on dominant faecal microbiota and short-chain fatty acids production in sows.
Śliżewska, Katarzyna;Chlebicz, Agnieszka;
Vol. 366 , No. Supplement_1 , pp. i133-i146
408 views DOI Abstract
2009
possum escore como preditor de mortalidade em pacientes cirúrgicos utilizacion del puntaje possum como indicador de la mortalidad en pacientes quirúrgicos possum scoring system for predicting mortality in surgical patients
;Adriana Cristina Galbiatti Parminondi Elias;Tiemi Matsuo;Cíntia Magalhães Carvalho Grion;Lucienne Tibery Queiroz Cardoso;Paulo Henrique Verri
Vol. 43 , No. 1 , pp. 23-29
401 views DOI Abstract
1994
Enrichment of bifidobacteria from human gut contents by oligofructose using continuous culture
Gibson GR;Wang X;;
Vol. 118 , No. 1-2 , pp. -
400 views Abstract
1992
Co-transfer of vancomycin and other resistance genes from Enterococcus faecalis NCTC 12201 to Staphylococcus aureus
Noble WC;Virani Z;Cree RG;;
Vol. 72 , No. 2 , pp. -
392 views Abstract
2010
abordagem assistencial ao neonato portador de mielomeningocele segundo o modelo de adaptação de roy abordaje asistencial al neonato portador de mielomeningocele según el modelo de adaptación de roy care delivery to newborns with myelomeningocele according to roy's adaptation model
;Eloah de Paula Pessoa Gurgel;Karla Maria Carneiro Rolim;Marli Terezinha Gimenez Galvão;Joselany Áfio Caetano
Vol. 44 , No. 3 , pp. 702-707
367 views DOI Abstract
2019
Effects of synbiotics on the gut microbiota, blood and rearing parameters of chickens.
Śliżewska, Katarzyna;Markowiak, Paulina;Żbikowski, Artur;Szeleszczuk, Piotr;
Vol. 366 , No. Supplement_1 , pp. i114-i126
354 views DOI Abstract
2008
mulheres vivendo com aids e os profissionais do programa saúde da família: revelando o diagnóstico mujeres viviendo con sida y los profesionales del programa salud de la família: revelando el diagnóstico women living with aids and the family health program professionals: disclosing the diagnosis
;Fernanda Cristina Ferreira;Lúcia Yasuko Izumi Nichiata
Vol. 42 , No. 3 , pp. 483-489
353 views DOI Abstract
2013
projeções e expectativas de ingressantes no curso de formação docente em educação profissional técnica na saúde proyecciones y expectativas de ingresantes al curso de formación docente en educación profesional técnica de salud projections and expectations of students enrolled in a teaching qualification in a technical health professional education course
;Maria José Sanches Marin;Silvia Franco da Rocha Tonhom;Adriana Paula Congro Michelone;Elza de Fátima Ribeiro Higa;Mário do Carmo Martini Bernardo;Cláudia Mara de Melo Tavares
Vol. 47 , No. 1 , pp. 221-228
343 views Abstract
2013
avaliação de tecnologia educativa na modalidade literatura de cordel sobre amamentação
;Paula Marciana Pinheiro de Oliveira;Lorita Marlena Freitag Pagliuca
Vol. 47 , No. 1 , pp. 205-212
343 views DOI Abstract
View All 177 Articles
43
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
40
65
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

43.1/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

39.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

65.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.