Sugar-induced cell death in exponentially growing yeast depends on the functionality of the nonoxidative branch of the pentose phosphate pathway

Clicks: 4
ID: 338001
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #238 of 241 articles by views in FEMS microbiology letters

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 241 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract Sugar-induced cell death (SICD) remains an intriguing but poorly studied phenomenon in the physiology of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Recently, it was shown that SICD development largely depends on the redirection of glucose fluxes between glycolysis and the pentose phosphate pathway (PPP). In particular, inhibition of glycolysis by iodoacetamide (IAA) was observed to reduce SICD levels. This study is devoted to further investigation of the relationship between SICD and the functionality of the two PPP branches. It was shown that deletion of the ZWF1 gene does not affect the decrease in SICD levels in IAA-treated cells. This allows us to conclude that the oxidative branch of the PPP is not involved in the suppression of SICD/ROS. Deletion of the GLR1 gene and attenuation of the TRR1 gene also did not restore SICD levels in cells after IAA treatment. The obtained results indicate that the level of reduced glutathione or thioredoxin does not affect SICD genesis. The addition of 5 mM ribose-5-phosphate (R5P) to the incubation medium led to suppression of SICD by 79%. At the same time, the addition of 5 mM ribose + 5 mM Pi suppressed SICD by only 20%. Suppression of SICD by 5 mM R5P in the Δpho3 strain (83%) excludes the mechanism of extracellular dephosphorylation of R5P to ribose, its subsequent transport into the cell, and re-phosphorylation inside the cell. Furthermore, more than 70% suppression of SICD in the Δend3 strain with 5 mM R5P excludes endocytosis as a mechanism of R5P import into the cell. The observed effect of R5P can be explained by the moonlighting function of some unknown protein. Thus, SICD development in S. cerevisiae cells depends on the final product of the non-oxidative PPP—R5P.
Reference Key
openalex_W7225017758 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Airat Ya. Valiakhmetov
Are you one of these authors? Claim your profile
Journal FEMS microbiology letters
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/femsle/fnag137
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/femsle/fnag137
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.