se pu = chinese journal of chromatography | Journament

Journal Ranking

#4254 / 33,958
📉 Poor
Overall Score
36.5/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
41
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 weeks ago

se pu = chinese journal of chromatography

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name se pu
Abbreviated Name se pu
ISSN 1000-8713
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (69 total)

2019
[Application of proteomics and metabolomics in microbial metabolic engineering].
Vol. 37 , No. 8 , pp. 798-805
422 views DOI Abstract
2015
[Determination of 35 antibiotic residues of tetracyclines, sulfonamides, penicillins, macrolides and amphenicols in milk by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectromtery].
Vol. 33 , No. 9 , pp. 995-1001
405 views Abstract
2019
[Rapid screening and confirmation of 20 mycotoxins in grain products by ultrahigh performance liquid chromatography- quadrupole/electrostatic field orbitrap high- resolution mass spectrometry].
Vol. 37 , No. 11 , pp. 1241-1248
373 views DOI Abstract
2019
[Simultaneous determination of antibiotics and triphenylmethanes veterinary drug residues in fish and shrimp by dispersive solid phase extraction purification-ultra high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry].
Vol. 37 , No. 9 , pp. 946-954
370 views DOI Abstract
2019
[Rapid screening and identification of 52 pesticide residues in flavored tea by improved QuEChERS combined with liquid chromatography-quadrupole-time-of-flight mass spectrometry].
Vol. 37 , No. 9 , pp. 955-962
360 views DOI Abstract
2019
[Analysis of monosaccharide composition in polysaccharides from L. by precolumn labeling under mild conditions and high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry].
Vol. 37 , No. 11 , pp. 1162-1172
345 views DOI Abstract
2019
[Simultaneous analysis of five organic acids in aqueous, lotion, and cream cosmetics by capillary electrophoresis].
Vol. 37 , No. 7 , pp. 773-777
338 views DOI Abstract
2014
when change reiterates the norm: curriculum restructuring of medicine in possible connections with sexuality and gender
Vol. 24 , No. 45 , pp. 144-161
315 views Abstract
2010
[Application of solid phase extraction disk in the determination of acrylamide in tap water].
Vol. 28 , No. 12 , pp. 1196-9
296 views Abstract
36
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
41
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

36.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

41.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.