Indexed in Journament

food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the british industrial biological research association

ISSN 1873-6351· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
39.8/100
Journament Score
#7,852
Journament Rank
54
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name food chem toxicol
Abbreviated Name food chem toxicol
ISSN 1873-6351
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/food-and-chemical-toxicology

Indexings

ncbi

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (54)

2018
PAHs in seafood from the Mediterranean Sea: An exposure risk assessment.
Vol. 115 , pp. 385-390
515 views DOI Abstract
2019
Cytotoxic xanthones isolated from Calophyllum depressinervosum and Calophyllum buxifolium with antioxidant and cytotoxic activities.
, pp. 110800
495 views DOI Abstract
2019
2010
Antioxidant effects of the chestnut (Castanea crenata) inner shell extract in t-BHP-treated HepG2 cells, and CCl4- and high-fat diet-treated mice.
Vol. 48 , No. 11 , pp. 3177-83
428 views DOI Abstract
2019
Dietary zinc deficiency or supplementation during gestation increases breast cancer susceptibility in adult female mice offspring following a J-shaped pattern and through distinct mechanisms.
, pp. 110813
412 views DOI Abstract
2019
Anti-diabetic effect of oligosaccharides from seaweed Sargassum confusum via JNK-IRS1/PI3K signalling pathways and regulation of gut microbiota.
, pp. 110562
410 views DOI Abstract
2019
Metals in sardine and anchovy from Greek coastal areas: Public health risk and nutritional benefits assessment.
Vol. 123 , pp. 113-124
409 views DOI Abstract
2019
Evaluation the binding of chelerythrine, a potentially harmful toxin, with bovine serum albumin.
, pp. 110933
389 views DOI Abstract
2019
Long-term effects of low doses of Chlorpyrifos exposure at the preweaning developmental stage: A locomotor, pharmacological, brain gene expression and gut microbiome analysis.
, pp. 110865
388 views DOI Abstract
2020
RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, lauric acid, CAS Registry Number 143-07-7.
, pp. 111383
362 views DOI
2020
Updated population minimal eliciting dose distributions for use in risk assessment of 14 priority food allergens.
Vol. 139 , pp. 111259
368 views DOI Abstract
2020
Maternal exposure to mixtures of dienestrol, linuron and flutamide. Part I: Feminization effects on male rat offspring.
, pp. 111256
215 views DOI Abstract
2020
Pseudocereal grains: Nutritional value, health benefits and current applications for the development of gluten-free foods.
, pp. 111178
303 views DOI Abstract
2020
Obesogenic effects of chlorpyrifos and its metabolites during the differentiation of 3T3-L1 preadipocytes.
, pp. 111171
260 views DOI Abstract
2020
Bisphenol A and several derivatives exert neural toxicity in human neuron-like cells by decreasing neurite length.
Vol. 135 , pp. 111015
237 views DOI Abstract
2019
Mequindox induces apoptosis, DNA damage, and carcinogenicity in Wistar rats.
Vol. 127 , pp. 270-279
295 views DOI Abstract
2019
RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, 10-dodecen-3-one, 5-hydroxy-7,11-dimethyl-, CAS registry number 68922-12-3.
, pp. 111100
276 views DOI
2019
Detection of zearalenone in an aptamer assay using attenuated internal reflection ellipsometry and it's cereal sample applications.
Vol. 136 , pp. 111081
269 views DOI Abstract
2019
'All chemical substances are harmful.' public appraisal of uncertain risks of food additives and contaminants.
, pp. 110959
343 views DOI Abstract
40
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
40
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

39.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

39.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.