Indexed in Journament

nursing education perspectives

ISSN 1536-5026· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
34.9 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #9,436 of 29,297 scored journals (34,015 indexed)
23 Articles
Scores higher than 67.7% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name nurs educ perspect
Abbreviated Name nurs educ perspect
ISSN 1536-5026
URL https://journals.lww.com/neponline/Pages/default.aspx

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.9 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 23.1
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 31.1 26.3
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 8.6 4.3
Content Distribution 76.5 89.2
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (23)

Medication Safety of Patients With Parkinson's Disease During Care Transitions: Educating Nursing Students.
Ellis, Diane M;Hickey, Shelley;Prieto, Patricia;Doyle, Adeline;Galvin, Meghan;Vernon, Gwyn;OʼConnor, Melissa;
Vol. 40 , No. 6 , pp. E22-E24
442 views DOI Abstract
Development and Validation of an Instrument to Measure Transformation From Study Abroad.
Foronda, Cynthia;Phitwong, Ame;
Vol. 40 , No. 5 , pp. 303-305
413 views DOI Abstract
Through the Lens of Postcolonial Theory: Establishing Global North-South Partnerships.
Healey-Walsh, Judith;Stuart-Shor, Eileen;Muchira, James;
Vol. 40 , No. 5 , pp. 270-277
407 views DOI Abstract
Graduate-Entry Education for Nonnurses: Preparation, Pathways, and Progress.
Jackson, Molly;Marchi, Nadine;
Vol. 41 , No. 1 , pp. 30-32
406 views DOI Abstract
2020
The Professional Behaviors New Nurses Need: Findings From a National Survey of Hospital Nurse Leaders.
Sortedahl, Charlotte;Ellefson, Shanna;Fotsch, Danielle;Daley, Katie;
401 views DOI Abstract
Practices and Attitudes of Nursing Students Toward Patients With Disordered Eating Behaviors.
Phillips, Kathryn E;LoGiudice, Jenna A;
Vol. 41 , No. 1 , pp. 49-51
398 views DOI Abstract
NLN Core Competencies for Nurse Educators: Are They Present in the Course Descriptions of Academic Nurse Educator Programs?
Fitzgerald, Ann;McNelis, Angela M;Billings, Diane M;
Vol. 41 , No. 1 , pp. 4-9
397 views DOI Abstract
The Potential of Blockchain in Education and Health Care.
Skiba, Diane J;
Vol. 38 , No. 4 , pp. 220-221
391 views DOI
Don't Be a Serial Citer. Synthesize!
Monsivais, Diane B;Robbins, Leslie K;
Vol. 41 , No. 1 , pp. 65-66
389 views DOI Abstract
2020
Problem-Based Learning and Case Scenarios: An Interprofessional Pharmacology Experience.
Rosenbloom, Sylvie;Nemec, Eric C;
377 views DOI Abstract
2020
Problem-Based Learning and Case Scenarios: An Interprofessional Pharmacology Experience.
Rosenbloom, Sylvie;Nemec, Eric C;
377 views DOI Abstract
2020
Developing Local Evidence about Faculty Written Exam Questions: Asian ESL Nursing Student Perceptions about Linguistic Modification
Mulready-Shick, J.
Vol. 41 , pp. 109-111
170 views DOI
2020
Fostering the Integration of Extrinsic Motivation in an Online Graduate Nursing Education Course.
Murphy, Jackie;Leggieri, Alyssa;Murphy, Glenn;
350 views DOI Abstract
2020
The Professional Behaviors New Nurses Need: Findings From a National Survey of Hospital Nurse Leaders.
Sortedahl, Charlotte;Ellefson, Shanna;Fotsch, Danielle;Daley, Katie;
401 views DOI Abstract
2020
The Effects of Frequent Quizzing on Exam Scores in a Baccalaureate Nursing Course.
Sartain, Andrea F;Wright, Vivian H;
67 views DOI Abstract
2020
Practices and Attitudes of Nursing Students Toward Patients With Disordered Eating Behaviors
Phillips, K.
Vol. 41 , pp. 49-51
222 views DOI
2019
Development of the Diverse Standardized Patient Simulation Cultural Competence Education Strategy
Ozkara, San E.
Vol. 40 , pp. E31-E33
251 views DOI
2019
NLN Releases A Vision for Integration of the Social Determinants of Health Into Nursing Education Curricula
not, found
Vol. 40 , pp. 390
293 views DOI
2019
Quality Assurance in Higher Education: Evaluation of Adjunct Clinical Faculty.
Barker, Nancy;
366 views DOI Abstract
2019
Innovative Classroom Upgrade: Simulating an Intensive Care Unit Environment in an Undergraduate Academic Classroom.
Bautista, Cynthia;Bartos, Susan;
252 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
34.9/100 · Poor
Ranked #9,436 of 29,297 scored
(34,015 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

34.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

31.1/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

8.6/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

76.5/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.