Quality Assurance in Higher Education: Evaluation of Adjunct Clinical Faculty.
Clicks: 281
ID: 84132
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
79.5
/100
267 views
217 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
The clinical experience is often thought of as an opportunity to tie theory to practice. However, with the current shortage of full-time nursing faculty and the increased dependence on adjunct faculty, how do administrators ensure quality? The purpose of this exploratory descriptive study was to determine the evaluation practices of administrators from accredited universities. Administrators' (n = 26) methods of evaluation were collected via survey with follow-up interviews. Several themes emerged that may assist with the identification of issues in the evaluation of adjunct clinical faculty.
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (84 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
barker2019qualitynursing
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Barker, Nancy; |
| Journal | nursing education perspectives |
| Year | 2019 |
| DOI |
10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000000616
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.