Quality Assurance in Higher Education: Evaluation of Adjunct Clinical Faculty.

Clicks: 350
ID: 84132
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #10 of 23 articles by views in nursing education perspectives

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
The clinical experience is often thought of as an opportunity to tie theory to practice. However, with the current shortage of full-time nursing faculty and the increased dependence on adjunct faculty, how do administrators ensure quality? The purpose of this exploratory descriptive study was to determine the evaluation practices of administrators from accredited universities. Administrators' (n = 26) methods of evaluation were collected via survey with follow-up interviews. Several themes emerged that may assist with the identification of issues in the evaluation of adjunct clinical faculty.
Reference Key
barker2019qualitynursing Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Barker, Nancy;
Journal nursing education perspectives
Year 2019
DOI
10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000000616
URL
Keywords
depression quality of care performance measures treatment response measurement-based care psychotherapy outcomes

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.