Indexed in Journament

clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the american gastroenterological association

ISSN 1542-7714· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
29.0 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #21,256 of 29,297 scored journals (34,015 indexed)
38 Articles
Scores higher than 27.4% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name clin gastroenterol hepatol
Abbreviated Name clin gastroenterol hepatol
ISSN 1542-7714
URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/clinical-gastroenterology-and-hepatology

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the american gastroenterological association
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.1 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 23.1
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 5.6 25.4
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 10.0 4.1
Content Distribution 63.0 89.1
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (38)

2013
Endoscopic and clinical variables that predict sustained remission in children with ulcerative colitis treated with infliximab
Vol. 11 , No. 11 , pp. -
639 views Abstract
2017
Efficacy of Vedolizumab Induction and Maintenance Therapy in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis, Regardless of Prior Exposure to Tumor Necrosis Factor Antagonists
Vol. 15 , No. 2 , pp. -
457 views Abstract
2011
Cirrhosis is present in most patients with hepatitis B and hepatocellular carcinoma
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. -
443 views Abstract
2020
Development and Validation of the Asia-Pacific Proximal Colon Neoplasia Risk Score.
441 views DOI Abstract
2018
Efficacy of Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir for 8 or 12 Weeks in Patients With Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 2, 4, 5, or 6 Infection Without Cirrhosis
Vol. 16 , No. 3 , pp. -
422 views Abstract
2019
Adherence to Biopsy and Follow-Up Guidelines in a Population-Based Cohort of Children With Eosinophilic Esophagitis.
421 views DOI Abstract
2020
2014
Adalimumab induces deep remission in patients with Crohn's disease
Vol. 12 , No. 3 , pp. -
411 views Abstract
2019
Including Relative Adrenal Insufficiency in Definition and Classification of Acute on Chronic Liver Failure.
391 views DOI Abstract
2019
Rapid Response to Vedolizumab Therapy in Biologic-Naive Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
Vol. 17 , No. 1 , pp. -
381 views Abstract
2020
Development and Validation of Clinical Scoring Tool to Predict Outcomes of Treatment With Vedolizumab in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis
Vol. 18 , No. 13 , pp. -
280 views Abstract
2020
2020
Clinical Features of COVID-19-Related Liver Damage.
335 views DOI Abstract
2020
2020
Development and Validation of the Asia-Pacific Proximal Colon Neoplasia Risk Score.
441 views DOI Abstract
2019
Rapid Response to Vedolizumab Therapy in Biologic-Naive Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
Vol. 17 , No. 1 , pp. -
381 views Abstract
2019
Diet in treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.
364 views DOI Abstract
2019
Adherence to Biopsy and Follow-Up Guidelines in a Population-Based Cohort of Children With Eosinophilic Esophagitis.
421 views DOI Abstract
2019
Including Relative Adrenal Insufficiency in Definition and Classification of Acute on Chronic Liver Failure.
391 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
29.0/100 · Poor
Ranked #21,256 of 29,297 scored
(34,015 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

29.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

10.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

63.0/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.