Indexed in Journament

molecular medicine reports

ISSN 1791-3004· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
27.9 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #25,482 of 29,330 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
711 Articles
Scores higher than 13.1% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name mol med rep
Abbreviated Name mol med rep
ISSN 1791-3004
URL http://www.spandidos-publications.com/mmr

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for molecular medicine reports
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.0 30.3
Accessibility 20.0 18.3
Timeliness 0.0 12.6
Diversity 5.6 27.3
Innovation 70.0 28.9
Community Impact 5.7 9.7
Content Distribution 58.5 88.5
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (711)

1988
quinientos años de economía
Vol. 25 , No. 14 , pp. 86-87
637 views Abstract
2018
Peroxiredoxin I deficiency increases LPS‑induced lethal shock in mice
Vol. 18 , No. 2 , pp. -
510 views Abstract
2019
2018
Knockdown of peroxiredoxin V increases glutamate‑induced apoptosis in HT22 hippocampal neuron cells
Vol. 17 , No. 6 , pp. -
450 views Abstract
2017
Midazolam anesthesia protects neuronal cells from oxidative stress-induced death via activation of the JNK-ERK pathway
Vol. 15 , No. 1 , pp. 169-179
448 views
2019
Bryonia dioica aqueous extract induces apoptosis and G2/M cell cycle arrest in MDA‑MB 231 breast cancer cells.
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 73-80
442 views DOI Abstract
2019
Novel 1,4‑naphthoquinone derivatives induce reactive oxygen species‑mediated apoptosis in liver cancer cells
Vol. 19 , No. 3 , pp. -
441 views Abstract
2017
Novel copper complexes as potential proteasome inhibitors for cancer treatment (Review).
Vol. 15 , No. 1 , pp. 3-11
428 views DOI Abstract
1986
insectos de los páramos: maravillas en la coevolución entre plantas y animales
Vol. 23 , No. 08 , pp. 33-42
393 views Abstract
2019
Novel 1,4‑naphthoquinone derivatives induce reactive oxygen species‑mediated apoptosis in liver cancer cells
Vol. 19 , No. 3 , pp. -
441 views Abstract
2019
Bryonia dioica aqueous extract induces apoptosis and G2/M cell cycle arrest in MDA‑MB 231 breast cancer cells.
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 73-80
442 views DOI Abstract
2019
Significantly dysregulated genes in osteoarthritic labrum cells identified through gene expression profiling.
Vol. 20 , No. 2 , pp. 1716-1724
320 views DOI Abstract
2019
Screening of underlying genetic biomarkers for ankylosing spondylitis.
Vol. 19 , No. 6 , pp. 5263-5274
342 views DOI Abstract
2019
2018
Knockdown of peroxiredoxin V increases glutamate‑induced apoptosis in HT22 hippocampal neuron cells
Vol. 17 , No. 6 , pp. -
450 views Abstract
2018
Peroxiredoxin I deficiency increases LPS‑induced lethal shock in mice
Vol. 18 , No. 2 , pp. -
510 views Abstract
Journament Score
27.9/100 · Poor
Ranked #25,482 of 29,330 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

27.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

5.7/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

58.5/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.