Indexed in Journament

ankara Üniversitesi eğitim bilimleri fakültesi dergisi

EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
33.7/100
Journament Score
#12,431
Journament Rank
19
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name ankara Üniversitesi eğitim bilimleri fakültesi dergisi
Abbreviated Name ankara Üniversitesi eğitim bilimleri fakültesi dergisi

Indexings

doaj

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (19)

2010
2018
Pisagor Teoremini Nasıl Öğretirsiniz: Ders Planlarının Analizi
Vol. 51 , No. 1 , pp. 119-141
486 views Abstract
2011
Öğretmen Adaylarının Meslek Bilgisi, Alan Bilgisi Dersleri ve Öğretmen Olma İsteğine İlişkin Görüşleri
Vol. 44 , No. 1 , pp. 17-50
435 views Abstract
2003
Sınıf Öğretmeni Yetiştirme Programları ve Sanat Eğitimi
Vol. 36 , No. 1 , pp. 13-24
420 views Abstract
2019
4+4+4’ten Geriye Kalanlar: Türk Öğrencilerin Başarılarındaki Göreli Yaş Etkisi
Vol. 52 , No. 1 , pp. 139-161
305 views Abstract
2013
Kadınlarının sağlık eğitimi ihtiyaçlarının odak grup görüşmesi yöntemi ile belirlenmesi
Vol. 46 , No. 2 , pp. 399-418
296 views Abstract
2005
Kant’ın Ahlak Eğitimi Anlayışı
Vol. 38 , No. 1 , pp. 73-86
291 views Abstract
2005
İlköğretim Birinci Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Özellikleri ve İlk okuma Yazma Öğretimi
Vol. 38 , No. 1 , pp. 87-100
283 views Abstract
2017
Türkçe Öğretiminde kişiselleştirilmiş alıştırma soruları kullanmanın öğrenci başarısına etkisi
Vol. 50 , No. 1 , pp. 19-42
258 views Abstract
2019
4+4+4’ten Geriye Kalanlar: Türk Öğrencilerin Başarılarındaki Göreli Yaş Etkisi
Vol. 52 , No. 1 , pp. 139-161
305 views Abstract
2018
Pisagor Teoremini Nasıl Öğretirsiniz: Ders Planlarının Analizi
Vol. 51 , No. 1 , pp. 119-141
486 views Abstract
2017
kansatieteelliset kyselyt – kirjoittavan kansan kertomaa
Vol. 15 , No. 29 , pp. 121-124
14 views Abstract
2017
avoimempaa etnologista tutkimusprosessia etsimässä
Vol. 15 , No. 30 , pp. 210-214
16 views Abstract
2017
Türkçe Öğretiminde kişiselleştirilmiş alıştırma soruları kullanmanın öğrenci başarısına etkisi
Vol. 50 , No. 1 , pp. 19-42
258 views Abstract
2014
ihmettä katsomassa – etnografinen näyttely guadalupen neitsyt mariasta
Vol. 12 , No. 23 , pp. 10-15
19 views Abstract
2013
Sosyal-Duygusal Öğrenme Ölçeğinin Türkçe Formunun Geçerlik ve Güvenirliğinin Đncelenmesi
Vol. 46 , No. 1 , pp. 203-224
142 views Abstract
2013
Kadınlarının sağlık eğitimi ihtiyaçlarının odak grup görüşmesi yöntemi ile belirlenmesi
Vol. 46 , No. 2 , pp. 399-418
296 views Abstract
2012
Otizmli Çocuklara Sosyal Beceri Öğretiminde Sosyal Öykülerin Etkisinin İncelenmesi
Vol. 45 , No. 1 , pp. 165-190
204 views Abstract
34
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
33
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

33.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.