urologia | Journament

Journal Ranking

#4645 / 33,968
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.0/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 weeks ago

urologia

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name urologia
Abbreviated Name urologia
ISSN 1724-6075
Aim and Scope
URL https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/urologia-journal/journal203462
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (41 total)

Analysis of the results obtained with a new phytotherapeutic association for LUTS versus control. [corrected].
Bercovich, Eduard;Saccomanni, Mauro;
Vol. 77 , No. 3 , pp. 180-6
281 views Abstract
2020
Bladder cancer genomics.
Siracusano, Salvatore;Rizzetto, Riccardo;Porcaro, Antonio Benito;
, pp. 391560319899011
277 views DOI Abstract
o mapa enquanto discurso e o discurso do mapa: algumas questÕes
;Rogata Soares Del Gaudio
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 129-145
253 views DOI Abstract
a abordagem do pluralismo de processos e da evo-devo em livros didÁticos de biologia evolutiva e zoologia de vertebrados
;Wellington Bittencourt-dos-Santos;Charbel N. El-Hani
Vol. 15 , No. 3 , pp. 199-216
244 views DOI Abstract
histÓria da formaÇÃo de professores: diÁlogos com a disciplina escolar ciÊncias no ensino fundamental
;Ana Cléa Moreira Ayres;Sandra Escovedo Selles
Vol. 14 , No. 2 , pp. 95-107
241 views DOI Abstract
construÇÃo da identidade docente de um estudante de licenciatura em ciÊncias biolÓgicas em curso a distÂncia: um caso de hibridismo
;Mara Lúcia Rodrigues Costa;Flavia Rezende
Vol. 16 , No. 1 , pp. 149-170
237 views DOI Abstract
2010
el uso de actividad de latoratorio de biologÍa para la enseÑanza de matemÁtica en los aÑos iniciales: una estrategia interdiciplinaria de enseÑanza y aprendizaje
;Jacira Helena Bridi;Marilaine de Fraga Sant´ Ana;Marlise Geller;Juliana da Silva
Vol. 12 , No. 3 , pp. 131-150
196 views Abstract
anÁlise do tema virologia em livros didÁticos de biologia do ensino mÉdio
;Marcus Vinicius de Aragão Batista;Marlécio Maknamara da Silva Cunha;Alexandre Luna Cândido
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. 145-158
195 views DOI Abstract
uma anÁlise bakhtiniana/volochinoviana da psicanÁlise: reflexÕes necessÁrias para o estabelecimento de um novo paradigma em ensino de ciÊncias
;Cristina dos Santos Bianchi*
Vol. 18 , No. 2 , pp. 201-210
187 views DOI
2008
saberes previos y sentido común en la enseñanza-aprendizaje de las ciencias: un enfoque desde la historia epistemológica de las ciencias
;Jorge Márquez Valderrama
Vol. 10 , No. 2 , pp. 1-11
182 views Abstract
View All 41 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
30
35
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.