Indexed in Journament

urologia

ISSN 1724-6075· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
23.6 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #27,664 of 29,298 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
41 Articles
Scores higher than 5.5% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name urologia
Abbreviated Name urologia
ISSN 1724-6075
URL https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/urologia-journal/journal203462

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.4
Accessibility 20.0
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 37.5
Community Impact 9.3
Content Distribution 37.4
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.4 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 22.5
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity — 22.7
Innovation 37.5 24.1
Community Impact 9.3 4.2
Content Distribution 37.4 88.7
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (41)

2020
Bladder cancer genomics.
Siracusano, Salvatore;Rizzetto, Riccardo;Porcaro, Antonio Benito;
, pp. 391560319899011
324 views DOI Abstract
Analysis of the results obtained with a new phytotherapeutic association for LUTS versus control. [corrected].
Bercovich, Eduard;Saccomanni, Mauro;
Vol. 77 , No. 3 , pp. 180-6
318 views Abstract
a abordagem do pluralismo de processos e da evo-devo em livros didÁticos de biologia evolutiva e zoologia de vertebrados
;Wellington Bittencourt-dos-Santos;Charbel N. El-Hani
Vol. 15 , No. 3 , pp. 199-216
293 views DOI Abstract
o mapa enquanto discurso e o discurso do mapa: algumas questÕes
;Rogata Soares Del Gaudio
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 129-145
291 views DOI Abstract
histÓria da formaÇÃo de professores: diÁlogos com a disciplina escolar ciÊncias no ensino fundamental
;Ana Cléa Moreira Ayres;Sandra Escovedo Selles
Vol. 14 , No. 2 , pp. 95-107
288 views DOI Abstract
construÇÃo da identidade docente de um estudante de licenciatura em ciÊncias biolÓgicas em curso a distÂncia: um caso de hibridismo
;Mara Lúcia Rodrigues Costa;Flavia Rezende
Vol. 16 , No. 1 , pp. 149-170
272 views DOI Abstract
anÁlise do tema virologia em livros didÁticos de biologia do ensino mÉdio
;Marcus Vinicius de Aragão Batista;Marlécio Maknamara da Silva Cunha;Alexandre Luna Cândido
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. 145-158
243 views DOI Abstract
2010
el uso de actividad de latoratorio de biologÍa para la enseÑanza de matemÁtica en los aÑos iniciales: una estrategia interdiciplinaria de enseÑanza y aprendizaje
;Jacira Helena Bridi;Marilaine de Fraga Sant´ Ana;Marlise Geller;Juliana da Silva
Vol. 12 , No. 3 , pp. 131-150
232 views Abstract
uma anÁlise bakhtiniana/volochinoviana da psicanÁlise: reflexÕes necessÁrias para o estabelecimento de um novo paradigma em ensino de ciÊncias
;Cristina dos Santos Bianchi*
Vol. 18 , No. 2 , pp. 201-210
228 views DOI
2008
saberes previos y sentido común en la enseñanza-aprendizaje de las ciencias: un enfoque desde la historia epistemológica de las ciencias
;Jorge Márquez Valderrama
Vol. 10 , No. 2 , pp. 1-11
220 views Abstract
2020
Bladder cancer genomics.
Siracusano, Salvatore;Rizzetto, Riccardo;Porcaro, Antonio Benito;
, pp. 391560319899011
324 views DOI Abstract
2015
o papel da argumentaÇÃo no ensino de ciÊncias: liÇÕes de um workshop
;Daniela Lopes Scarpa
Vol. 17 , pp. 15-30
44 views Abstract
2015
editorial
;Silvania Sousa do Nascimento
Vol. 17 , No. 1 , pp. 10-12
40 views Abstract
2014
Ética no ensino de ciÊncias: o posicionamento de professores de ciÊncias sobre eticidade durante a abordagem do tema transgÊnicos e suas implicaÇÕes socioambientais
;Wanderley Pivatto Brum;Elcio Schuhmacher
Vol. 16 , No. 1 , pp. 189-209
61 views Abstract
2014
aportes teÓricos e metodolÓgicos para a constituiÇÃo de um grupo de planejamento conjunto com docentes da licenciatura em fÍsica
;João Ricardo Neves da Silva;Lizete Maria Orquiza de Carvalho
Vol. 16 , No. 2 , pp. 85-106
159 views Abstract
2014
anÁlise de questÕes de fÍsica do enem pela taxonomia de bloom revisada
;Vailton Afonso da Silva;Maria Inês Martins
Vol. 16 , No. 3 , pp. 189-202
28 views Abstract
2013
a recepÇÃo da epistemologia de fleck pela pesquisa em educaÇÃo em ciÊncias no brasil
;Leonir Lorenzetti;Cristiane Muenchen;Iône Inês Pinsson Slongo
Vol. 15 , No. 3 , pp. 181-197
115 views Abstract
2013
interaÇÕes discursivas em pequeno grupo durante uma atividade investigativa sobre determinaÇÃo da aceleraÇÃo da gravidade
;Marta Maximo Pereira
Vol. 15 , No. 2 , pp. 65-85
34 views Abstract
2013
o papel do problema no ensino de ciÊncias: compreensÕes de pesquisadores que se referenciam em vygotsky
;Simoni Tormohlen Gehlen;Demétrio Delizoicov
Vol. 15 , No. 2 , pp. 45-63
141 views Abstract
2012
tema sociocientÍfico "cachaÇa" em aulas prÁticas de quÍmica na educaÇÃo profissional: uma abordagem cts
;Míriam Stassun dos Santos;Carmem Lúcia Costa Amaral;Maria Delourdes Maciel
Vol. 14 , No. 1 , pp. 227-239
27 views Abstract
Journament Score
23.6/100 · Poor
Ranked #27,664 of 29,298 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

23.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

37.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

9.3/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

37.4/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.