Indexed in Journament

trends in biochemical sciences

ISSN 0968-0004· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
30.9 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #21,119 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
42 Articles
Scores higher than 28% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name trends in biochemical sciences
ISSN 0968-0004
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/trends-in-biochemical-sciences

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.4
Accessibility 20.0
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 3.6
Content Distribution 54.1
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.4 30.1
Accessibility 20.0 17.9
Timeliness 0.0 19.2
Diversity — 28.8
Innovation 70.0 31.2
Community Impact 3.6 13.4
Content Distribution 54.1 88.4
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (42)

2016
Type III Secretion: Building and Operating a Remarkable Nanomachine
Portaliou AG;Tsolis KC;Loos MS;Zorzini V;Economou A;;
Vol. 41 , No. 2 , pp. -
438 views Abstract
2007
famílias com trabalho e famílias sem trabalho: evidências de polarização para o brasil
;Luiz Guilherme Scorzafave;Naércio Aquino Menezes-Filho
Vol. 37 , No. 3 , pp. 563-584
316 views DOI Abstract
2004
o uso de recursos florestais e as políticas econômicas brasileiras: uma visão histórica e parcial de um processo de desenvolvimento
;Carlos José Caetano Bacha
Vol. 34 , No. 2 , pp. 393-426
304 views DOI Abstract
2010
impactos dos subsídios agrícolas dos estados unidos na expansão do agronegócio brasileiro
;Adelson Martins Figueiredo;Maurinho Luiz dos Santos;Maria Aparecida Silva Oliveira;Antônio Carvalho Campos
Vol. 40 , No. 2 , pp. 445-467
298 views DOI Abstract
2007
CPEB: a life in translation
Richter JD;;
Vol. 32 , No. 6 , pp. -
293 views Abstract
2006
a mão invisível de júpiter e o método newtoniano de smith
;Hugo E. A. da Gama Cerqueira
Vol. 36 , No. 4 , pp. 667-697
277 views DOI Abstract
2008
brazilian business cycles and growth from 1850 to 2000
;Eurilton Araújo;Luciane Carpena;Alexandre B. Cunha
Vol. 38 , No. 3 , pp. 557-581
272 views DOI Abstract
crescimento econômico e pressão sobre recursos hídricos
;Arno P. Schmitz;Mauricio Vaz Lobo Bittencourt
Vol. 47 , No. 2 , pp. 329-363
263 views DOI Abstract
2013
eficiência na provisão de educação pública municipal: uma análise em três estágios dos municípios brasileiros
;Flávio de Oliveira Gonçalves;Marco Túlio Aniceto França
Vol. 43 , No. 2 , pp. 271-299
238 views DOI Abstract
2005
determinantes dos investimentos diretos externos em países em desenvolvimento
;Marcelo José Braga Nonnenberg;Mário Jorge Cardoso de Mendonça
Vol. 35 , No. 4 , pp. 631-655
235 views DOI Abstract
2020
FANally…A Structure Emerges of the Fanconi Anemia Core Complex
Aguirre, J.
, pp. 0-0
172 views DOI
2016
Type III Secretion: Building and Operating a Remarkable Nanomachine
Portaliou AG;Tsolis KC;Loos MS;Zorzini V;Economou A;;
Vol. 41 , No. 2 , pp. -
438 views Abstract
2015
evidências sobre curva ambiental de kuznets e convergência das emissões
;Ednilson Sebastião de Ávila;Eliezer Martins Diniz
Vol. 45 , No. 1 , pp. 97-126
110 views DOI Abstract
2015
estimando o desalinhamento cambial brasileiro: uma análise de robustez a partir do modelo global com mecanismo de correção de erros
;Emerson Fernandes Marçal
Vol. 45 , No. 3 , pp. 593-623
73 views DOI Abstract
2014
phillips curve in brazil: an unobserved components approach
;Vicente da Gama Machado;Marcelo Savino Portugal
Vol. 44 , No. 4 , pp. 787-814
169 views DOI Abstract
2014
quais os impactos da desaposentação? um estudo para as aposentadorias por tempo de contribuição do regime geral de previdência social
;Angelo José Zanella;João Vinícius de França Carvalho;Luís Eduardo Afonso
Vol. 44 , No. 4 , pp. 723-748
135 views DOI Abstract
2014
heurísticas no estudo das decisões econômicas: contribuições de herbert simon, daniel kahneman e amos tversky
;Adriana Sbicca
Vol. 44 , No. 3 , pp. 579-603
110 views DOI Abstract
2014
crescimento pró-pobre no nordeste do brasil: uma análise dos períodos (1991-2000 e 2000-2010)
;Raul da Mota Silveira Neto
Vol. 44 , No. 3 , pp. 497-526
115 views DOI Abstract
2014
É atrativo tornar-se professor do ensino médio no brasil?: evidências com base em decomposições paramétricas e não paramétricas
;Ariana Martins de Britto;Fábio D. Waltenberg
Vol. 44 , No. 1 , pp. 5-44
178 views DOI Abstract
2013
esforço inovativo e desempenho exportador: evidências para brasil, Índia e china
;Ana Paula M. Avellar;Luciana Carvalho
Vol. 43 , No. 3 , pp. 499-524
34 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
30.9/100 · Poor
Ranked #21,119 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

30.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

3.6/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

54.1/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.