a mão invisível de júpiter e o método newtoniano de smith

Clicks: 319
ID: 203152
2006
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #7 of 42 articles by views in trends in biochemical sciences

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Este ensaio discute o modo como Adam Smith compreendia a filosofia e a ciência, as motivações que orientam nossos esforços de conhecer a natureza e a sociedade e o método que deve orientar estas investigações e a exposição de seus resultados. Simultaneamente, o texto aponta os equívocos das interpretações que viram em sua obra uma expressão do mecanicismo e de uma espécie de "positivismo" avant la lettre.
This paper examines Adam Smith's understanding of the philosophy and science, the motivations that lead us to investigate nature and society, and the proper methods of investigation and exposition. The paper also criticizes those authors that interpret Smith's work as an example of the mechanical approach or as a kind of positivism avant la lettre.
Reference Key
cerqueira2006estudosa Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Hugo E. A. da Gama Cerqueira
Journal trends in biochemical sciences
Year 2006
DOI
10.1590/S0101-41612006000400001
URL
http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-41612006000400001
Keywords
methodology metodologia

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.