Indexed in Journament

european romantic review

EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
37.9/100
Journament Score
#9,170
Journament Rank
28
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name european romantic review
Abbreviated Name european romantic review

Publications Per Year

Articles (28)

2004
structure study of donor doped barium titan ate prepared from citrate solutions
Vol. 36 , No. 3 , pp. 179-188
298 views DOI Abstract
2002
porosity of silicon carbide ceramics
Vol. 34 , No. 2 , pp. 143-156
296 views DOI Abstract
2004
sintering al2o3-cr composites made from micro-and nan powders
Vol. 36 , No. 3 , pp. 171-177
277 views DOI Abstract
2006
electrical properties of zno varistors prepared by direct mixing of constituent phases
Vol. 38 , No. 2 , pp. 161-167
267 views DOI Abstract
2016
parameter optimization for sintering of la0.6sr0.4co0.2fe0.8o3-6 (lscf6428) perovskite-structured ceramics by taguchi method
Vol. 48 , No. 2 , pp. 177-189
249 views DOI Abstract
2017
electrical characteristics of er doped batio3 ceramics
Vol. 49 , No. 2 , pp. 129-137
245 views DOI Abstract
2016
impact-induced damage accumulation at micro- and nanostructural scale levels in sintered powders sio2, sic, and al2o3 and in their single crystal counterparts
Vol. 48 , No. 3 , pp. 273-281
230 views DOI Abstract
2013
solid state batteries (ssbs) prepared with powder metallurgy route
Vol. 45 , No. 2 , pp. 149-155
213 views DOI Abstract
2012
construction of master sintering curve of tho2 pellets using optimization technique
Vol. 44 , No. 2 , pp. 147-160
198 views DOI Abstract
2017
electrical characteristics of er doped batio3 ceramics
Vol. 49 , No. 2 , pp. 129-137
245 views DOI Abstract
2016
impact-induced damage accumulation at micro- and nanostructural scale levels in sintered powders sio2, sic, and al2o3 and in their single crystal counterparts
Vol. 48 , No. 3 , pp. 273-281
230 views DOI Abstract
2016
parameter optimization for sintering of la0.6sr0.4co0.2fe0.8o3-6 (lscf6428) perovskite-structured ceramics by taguchi method
Vol. 48 , No. 2 , pp. 177-189
249 views DOI Abstract
2015
wear load capacity of crossed helical gears with wheel made from sintered steel
Vol. 47 , No. 2 , pp. 153-163
158 views DOI Abstract
2015
effect of ga2o3 addition on the properties of y2o3-doped aln ceramics
Vol. 47 , No. 1 , pp. 23-29
188 views DOI Abstract
2014
isokinetic parameters of thermal degradation of powder of [cd(n-boc-gly)2(h2o)2]n
Vol. 46 , No. 3 , pp. 323-330
182 views DOI Abstract
2014
kinetic reduction of mill scale via hydrogen
Vol. 46 , No. 1 , pp. 107-116
1 views DOI Abstract
2013
solid state batteries (ssbs) prepared with powder metallurgy route
Vol. 45 , No. 2 , pp. 149-155
213 views DOI Abstract
2012
construction of master sintering curve of tho2 pellets using optimization technique
Vol. 44 , No. 2 , pp. 147-160
198 views DOI Abstract
38
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
38
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

37.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

38.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.