european romantic review | Journament

Journal Ranking

#3753 / 33,956
📉 Poor
Overall Score
37.9/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
38
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

european romantic review

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name european romantic review
Abbreviated Name european romantic review
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (28 total)

2002
porosity of silicon carbide ceramics
;Slutsker A.I.;Betekhtin V.I.;Sinani A.B.;Kadomtsev A.G.;Ordanyan S.S.
Vol. 34 , No. 2 , pp. 143-156
283 views DOI Abstract
2004
structure study of donor doped barium titan ate prepared from citrate solutions
;Stojanović B.D.;Mastelaro V.R.;Paiva Santos C.O.;Varela J.A.
Vol. 36 , No. 3 , pp. 179-188
271 views DOI Abstract
2004
sintering al2o3-cr composites made from micro-and nan powders
;Pietrzak K.;Chmielewski M.;Włosiński W.
Vol. 36 , No. 3 , pp. 171-177
263 views DOI Abstract
2006
electrical properties of zno varistors prepared by direct mixing of constituent phases
;Žunić M.;Branković Z.;Branković G.
Vol. 38 , No. 2 , pp. 161-167
245 views DOI Abstract
2016
parameter optimization for sintering of la0.6sr0.4co0.2fe0.8o3-6 (lscf6428) perovskite-structured ceramics by taguchi method
;Hashim Siti Salwa;Bhatia Subhash;Mohamed Abdul Rahman
Vol. 48 , No. 2 , pp. 177-189
229 views DOI Abstract
1992
Novel eloisas: Revolutionary and counter-revolutionary narratives in helen maria williams, wordsworth & byron
Watson, N.
Vol. 3 , pp. 79-92
225 views DOI
2017
electrical characteristics of er doped batio3 ceramics
;Paunović Vesna;Mitić Vojislav V.;Đorđević Miloš;Marjanović Miloš;Kocić Ljubiša
Vol. 49 , No. 2 , pp. 129-137
224 views DOI Abstract
2016
impact-induced damage accumulation at micro- and nanostructural scale levels in sintered powders sio2, sic, and al2o3 and in their single crystal counterparts
;Chmel Alexandre;Kadomtsev Andrej;Shcherbakov Igor’
Vol. 48 , No. 3 , pp. 273-281
217 views DOI Abstract
2013
solid state batteries (ssbs) prepared with powder metallurgy route
;Hu J.;Zhao J.;Ren J.J.
Vol. 45 , No. 2 , pp. 149-155
206 views DOI Abstract
2012
construction of master sintering curve of tho2 pellets using optimization technique
;Ray Aditi;Banerjee Joydipta;Kutty T.R.G.;Kumar Arun;Banerjee Srikumar
Vol. 44 , No. 2 , pp. 147-160
187 views DOI Abstract
View All 28 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
38
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

38.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.