Indexed in Journament

the journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism

ISSN 1945-7197· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
32.9 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #14,963 of 29,324 scored journals (34,008 indexed)
44 Articles
Scores higher than 48.9% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name j clin endocrinol metab
Abbreviated Name j clin endocrinol metab
ISSN 1945-7197
URL https://academic.oup.com/jcem

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.9
Accessibility 20.0
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 7.9
Content Distribution 61.8
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for the journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.9 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 19.1
Timeliness 0.0 9.2
Diversity 25.8
Innovation 70.0 27.4
Community Impact 7.9 7.8
Content Distribution 61.8 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (44)

2013
Metabolic inflexibility is a feature of women with polycystic ovary syndrome and is associated with both insulin resistance and hyperandrogenism
Vol. 98 , No. 6 , pp. -
629 views Abstract
2000
Polycystic ovarian syndrome: evidence that flutamide restores sensitivity of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone pulse generator to inhibition by estradiol and progesterone
Vol. 85 , No. 11 , pp. -
629 views Abstract
2011
Adipose tissue has aberrant morphology and function in PCOS: enlarged adipocytes and low serum adiponectin, but not circulating sex steroids, are strongly associated with insulin resistance
Vol. 96 , No. 2 , pp. -
562 views Abstract
2019
Trimethylamine-N-oxide metabolites in the early pregnancy and risk of gestational diabetes: a nested case control study.
512 views DOI Abstract
2005
Adrenal hyperandrogenism is induced by fetal androgen excess in a rhesus monkey model of polycystic ovary syndrome
Vol. 90 , No. 12 , pp. -
488 views Abstract
2000
2002
2019
Adipose Insulin Resistance in Normal-Weight Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
Vol. 104 , No. 6 , pp. -
434 views Abstract
2015
development of creativity – an investment to the creative society
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. 401-413
426 views DOI Abstract
2019
Increased infection risk in Addison's disease and congenital adrenal hyperplasia: a primary care database cohort study.
422 views DOI Abstract
2021
The Association of Gut Microbiota with Osteoporosis is Mediated by Amino Acid Metabolism: Multiomics in a Large Cohort
, pp. -
147 views Abstract
2020
11-oxygenated C19 Steroids Do Not Distinguish the Hyperandrogenic Phenotype of PCOS Daughters from Girls with Obesity
, pp. -
182 views Abstract
2020
Impulse Control Disorders in Dopamine Agonist-Treated Hyperprolactinemia: Prevalence and Risk Factors.
Vol. 105 , No. 3
315 views DOI Abstract
2020
Significant benefits of AIP testing and clinical screening in familial isolated and young-onset pituitary tumors.
331 views DOI Abstract
2020
Insight into the Ontogeny of GnRH Neurons from Patients Born Without a Nose.
271 views DOI Abstract
2019
Adipose Insulin Resistance in Normal-Weight Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
Vol. 104 , No. 6 , pp. -
434 views Abstract
2019
Interrelationships between pituitary hormones as assessed from 24-h serum concentrations in healthy older subjects.
364 views DOI Abstract
2019
The Risks of Cardiovascular Disease and Mortality Following Weight Change in Adults with Diabetes: Results from ADVANCE.
Vol. 104 , pp. 1535-1546
316 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
32.9/100 · Poor
Ranked #14,963 of 29,324 scored
(34,008 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

32.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

7.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

61.8/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.