jurnal teknologi informasi dan ilmu komputer | Journament

Journal Ranking

#4609 / 33,958
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.0/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
37
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 weeks ago

jurnal teknologi informasi dan ilmu komputer

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
doaj
Short Name jurnal teknologi informasi dan ilmu komputer
Abbreviated Name jurnal teknologi informasi dan ilmu komputer
ISSN 0000-0000
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (22 total)

2017
a representaÇÃo da modernidade na poesia de charles baudelaire
;Edgar Roberto Kirchof
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 43-52
377 views DOI Abstract
2018
Penempatan Posisi Multi Kamera Berdasarkan Gaya Sutradara Berbasis Logika Fuzzy
Junaedi, Hartarto;Pranata, Jaya;Hariadi, Mochamad;Purnama, I Ketut Eddy;
Vol. 5 , No. 6 , pp. 687-696
363 views Abstract
2018
Pengukuran Kualitas Website Pemerintah Desa Jagalempeni Menggunakan Metode Webqual 4.0
Warjiyono, Warjiyono;Hellyana, Corie Mei;
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 139-146
355 views Abstract
2019
Fuzzy Time Series dan Algoritme Average Based Length untuk Prediksi Pekerja Migran Indonesia
Solikhin, Solikhin;Yudatama, Uky;
Vol. 6 , No. 4 , pp. 369-376
313 views Abstract
2019
Sistem Pengenalan Wajah 3D Menggunakan ICP dan SVM
Novamizanti, Ledya;Lima, Nadya Viana De;Susatio, Eko;
Vol. 6 , No. 6 , pp. 601-610
307 views Abstract
2019
Analisis Kesenjangan dan Pemodelan Proses Bisnis Human Capital Management pada PTPN XI berdasarkan Best Practice SAP
Darmaningrat, Eko Wahyu Tyas;Astuti, Hanim Maria;Rizqy, Andhika Iman;
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 187-194
299 views Abstract
2018
Kajian dan Peluang Penelitian Tata Kelola Teknologi Informasi: Ulasan Literatur
Najwa, Nina Fadilah;Susanto, Tony Dwi;
Vol. 5 , No. 5 , pp. 517-530
289 views Abstract
2019
Penerapan Tanda Tangan Digital pada Gambar Formulir C1.Plano-KWK di Pilkada Sulawesi Selatan
Perdana, Rachmawan Atmaji;Anbiya, Dhika Rizki;Grahitandaru, Andrari;
Vol. 6 , No. 5 , pp. 475-484
276 views Abstract
2017
caminhos do desenho na bahia do sÉculo xviii
;Antonio Wilson Silva de Souza
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 61-74
251 views DOI Abstract
2017
ler as imagens dos desenhos animados: um hÁbito a ensinar e aprender na escola
;Carla Borges de Andrade
Vol. 13 , No. 1 , pp. 157-172
237 views DOI Abstract
View All 22 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

37.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.