cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : cq : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees | Journament

Journal Ranking

#3473 / 33,953
📉 Poor
Overall Score
35.0/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : cq : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name camb q healthc ethics
Abbreviated Name camb q healthc ethics
ISSN 1469-2147
Aim and Scope
URL http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=CQH
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (25 total)

1970
Does the "sanctity of human life" doctrine sanctify humanness, or life?
Koch T;;
Vol. 8 , No. 4 , pp. -
444 views Abstract
2017
a seguranÇa pÚblica como direito fundamental: o exercÍcio da competÊncia municipal e a cidade de osasco
;Antônio Cláudio da Costa Machado;Fábio Gonzaga de Carvalho;Igor Jefferson Lima Clemente;José Augusto Pereira Nunes Cordeiro;Robson Luiz Adami Louro Souza de Campos;Vaney Iori
Vol. 8 , No. 11 , pp. 161-196
297 views Abstract
2019
Treatability Statements in Serious Illness: The Gap Between What is Said and What is Heard.
Batten, Jason N;Wong, Bonnie O;Hanks, William F;Magnus, David C;
Vol. 28 , No. 3 , pp. 394-404
291 views DOI Abstract
2016
aplicabilidade das normas penais nas condutas ilÍcitas de cyberbullying cometidas em redes sociais na internet
;Rafael Giordano Gonçalves Brito;Ângela Issa Haonat
Vol. 5 , No. 6 , pp. 201-232
204 views Abstract
2017
The Cost of Conscience.
Kennett, Jeanette;
Vol. 26 , No. 1 , pp. 69-81
202 views Abstract
2016
os direitos da personalidade e a liberdade de imprensa: a condenaÇÃo antecipada do acusado ante a exposiÇÃo massificada da mÍdia
;José Ribamar Mendes Júnior
Vol. 7 , No. 9 , pp. 33-50
198 views Abstract
2015
icms sobre comÉrcio eletrÔnico. a inconstitucionalidade do icms sobre compras eletrÔnicas por consumidor final de mercadorias provenientes de outros estados, e questÕes processuais conexas. anÁlise À luz dos decretos 12.534, de 2010, e 12.831, de 2011, d
;André Portella
Vol. 6 , No. 7 , pp. 171-198
180 views Abstract
2015
notas sobre o pÓs-positivismo e a constitucionalidade da lei da ficha limpa
;Bruno da Fontoura Medina
Vol. 6 , No. 7 , pp. 217-244
178 views Abstract
2016
abordagens hermenÊuticas e jurÍdicas no tocante Às pesquisas em cÉlulas-tronco embrionÁrias
;Gustavo Paschoal T. de C. Oliveira
Vol. 4 , No. 4 , pp. 127-156
158 views Abstract
2017
educaÇÃo e justiÇa restaurativa: os desafios na resoluÇÃo de conflitos no ambiente escolar
;Paulo Fernando de Melo Martins;Julianne Freire Marques;Halyny Mendes Guimarães
Vol. 8 , No. 11 , pp. 11-28
143 views Abstract
View All 25 Articles
35
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

35.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.