analytical biochemistry | Journament

Journal Ranking

#3021 / 33,958
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.1/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 weeks ago

analytical biochemistry

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name anal biochem
Abbreviated Name anal biochem
ISSN 1096-0309
Aim and Scope
URL http://www.journals.elsevier.com/analytical-biochemistry-methods-in-the-biological-sciences
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (75 total)

2019
Label-free lateral flow assay for Listeria monocytogenes by aptamer-gated release of signal molecules.
Tasbasi, B Busra;Guner, Buket C;Sudagidan, Mert;Ucak, Samet;Kavruk, Murat;Ozalp, Veli C;
, pp. 113449
399 views DOI Abstract
1976
A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding
Bradford, Marion M
Vol. 72 , No. 1-2 , pp. 248-254
366 views
2020
Measurement of the tripeptides glutathione and ophthalmic acid by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.
Bollenbach, Alexander;Tsikas, Dimitrios;
, pp. 113841
362 views DOI Abstract
2001
Application of a fluorometric assay for characterization of the catalytic competency of a domain III fragment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa exotoxin A
Armstrong S;Merrill AR;;
Vol. 292 , No. 1 , pp. -
359 views Abstract
2020
Inspector: A lysine succinylation predictor based on edited nearest-neighbor undersampling and adaptive synthetic oversampling.
Zhu, Yan;Jia, Cangzhi;Li, Fuyi;Song, Jiangning;
, pp. 113592
352 views DOI Abstract
2019
Corrigendum to “Pipeline for the generation of gene knockout mice using dual sgRNA CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing” (Analytical Biochemistry (2019) 568 (31–40), (S0003269718309345), (10.1016/j.ab.2018.12.002))
Ghassemi, B.
Vol. 583 , pp. 0-0
349 views DOI
2009
Determination of viable mammalian cells by luminol chemiluminescence using microperoxidase
Yamashoji S;;
Vol. 386 , No. 1 , pp. -
346 views Abstract
2018
Imaging DNA single-strand breaks generated by reactive oxygen species using a liquid crystal-based sensor.
Kim, Hyeong Jin;Jang, Chang-Hyun;
Vol. 556 , pp. 1-6
317 views DOI Abstract
2019
Glycation profile of minor abundant erythrocyte proteome across varying glycemic index in diabetes mellitus
Muralidharan, M.
Vol. 573 , pp. 37-43
311 views DOI
2019
A novel dye-based colorimetric chemosensors for sequential detection of Cu and cysteine in aqueous solution.
Tavallali, Hossein;Deilamy-Rad, Gohar;Karimi, Mohammad Ali;Rahimy, Eisa;
Vol. 583 , pp. 113376
300 views DOI Abstract
View All 75 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.