ferroelectrics | Journament

Journal Ranking

#3199 / 33,956
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 weeks ago

ferroelectrics

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name ferroelectrics
Abbreviated Name ferroelectrics
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (95 total)

2006
production of isoflavones, daidzein and genistein in callus cultures of pueraria candollei wall. ex benth. var. mirifica
Vol. 28 , No. Suppl.1 , pp. 45-53
715 views Abstract
2006
an in vitro inhibition of human malignant cell growth of crude water extract of cassava (manihot esculenta crantz) and commercial linamarin
Vol. 28 , No. Suppl.1 , pp. 145-155
321 views Abstract
2006
drying of rhinacanthus nasutus (linn.) kurz. using a solar dryer incorporated with a backup thermal energy storage from wood combustion
Vol. 28 , No. 3 , pp. 563-573
321 views Abstract
2016
beneficial effects of young coconut juice feeding on the lipid, renal and liver profiles, in ovariectomized rats: preliminary novel findings
Vol. 38 , No. 1 , pp. 57-65
317 views Abstract
2010
optimization of operating conditions of distillation columns: an energy saving option in refinery industry
Vol. 31 , No. 6 , pp. 661-664
303 views Abstract
2013
comparison of polymethylmethacrylate (pmma), native calcium sulfate, and high porous calcium sulfate beads as gentamicin carriers and osteoblast attachment
Vol. 35 , No. 3 , pp. 293-301
302 views Abstract
2004
aquatic plants for domestic wastewater treatment: lotus (nelumbo nucifera) and hydrilla (hydrilla verticillata) systems
Vol. 26 , No. 5 , pp. 749-756
296 views Abstract
2018
effect of the temperature-humidity index and lactation stage on milk production traits and somatic cell score of dairy cows in iran
Vol. 40 , No. 2 , pp. 379-383
284 views DOI Abstract
2005
some aspects in early life stage of climbing perch, anabas testudineus larvae
Vol. 27 , No. Suppl.1 , pp. 403-418
279 views Abstract
39
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

38.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.