physiological traits contributing to carbon storage variation in monastery bamboo and pai liang in northeastern thailand

Clicks: 226
ID: 238475
2017
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #50 of 95 articles by views in ferroelectrics

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
This study aims at comparing the carbon storage ability of Monastery bamboo (Thyrsostachys siamensis Gamble) and Pai Liang (Dendrocalamus membranaceus × Thyrsostachys siamensis) in terms of the different physiological responses to the microclimate. The stomatal conductance, leaf-to-air vapor pressure deficit (LAVPD), chlorophyll content, and water use efficiency (WUE) were measured. Pai Liang had a greater dry biomass per culm than Monastery bamboo, resulting in more carbon storage. Monastery bamboo kept opening its stomata even when LAVPD increased, resulting in the loss of more water and a lower WUE leading to a lower rate of growth and carbon storage. Pai Liang contained higher amount of carbon and nitrogen in the leaf tissue, indicating a better WUE. With regards to the climate change, Pai Liang is recommended owing to a greater carbon fixation and more rapid growth rate compared to the Monastery bamboo.
Reference Key
leksungnoen2017songklanakarinphysiological Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Nisa Leksungnoen
Journal ferroelectrics
Year 2017
DOI
10.14456/sjst-psu.2017.25
URL
http://rdo.psu.ac.th/sjstweb/journal/39-2/39-2-10.pdf
Keywords
water use efficiency carbon storagetechnologytechnology (general)sciencescience (general)

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.