Indexed in Journament

journal of pharmaceutical analysis

ISSN 2095-1779· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
34.8 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #9,688 of 29,298 scored journals (34,028 indexed)
57 Articles
Scores higher than 66.9% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name j pharm anal
Abbreviated Name journal of pharmaceutical analysis
ISSN 2095-1779
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-pharmaceutical-analysis

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.7 30.5
Accessibility 20.0 23.0
Timeliness 90.0 3.0
Diversity 5.6 25.9
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 9.3 6.0
Content Distribution 20.6 89.5
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (57)

2010
مقایسه سی ساله تشخیص‏های بالینی و هیستوپاتولوژیک ضایعات غدد بزاقی، کیست‏ها و تومورهای ادنتوژنیک در دانشکده دندانپزشکی مشهد-ایران
;نصرالله ساغروانیان;حسن حسین پور جاجرم;جهانشاه صالحی نژاد;منور افضل آقایی;نرگس قاضی
Vol. 34 , No. 4 , pp. 299-308
525 views Abstract
2012
Two spectrophotometric methods for simultaneous determination of some antihyperlipidemic drugs.
Abdelwahab, Nada S;El-Zeiny, Badr A;Tohamy, Salwa I;
Vol. 2 , No. 4 , pp. 279-284
494 views DOI Abstract
2016
Effects of urea, metal ions and surfactants on the binding of baicalein with bovine serum albumin
Roy, Atanu Singha;Dinda, Amit Kumar;Pandey, Nitin Kumar;Dasgupta, Swagata;
Vol. 6 , No. 4 , pp. 256-267
454 views Abstract
2017
In-depth investigation on physicochemical and thermal properties of magnesium (II) gluconate using spectroscopic and thermoanalytical techniques
Trivedi, Mahendra Kumar;Dixit, Neena;Panda, Parthasarathi;Sethi, Kalyan Kumar;Jana, Snehasis;
Vol. 7 , No. 5 , pp. 332-337
440 views Abstract
2017
Analysis of isoquinoline alkaloids from Mahonia leschenaultia and Mahonia napaulensis roots using UHPLC-Orbitrap-MSn and UHPLC-QqQLIT-MS/MS
Singh, Awantika;Bajpai, Vikas;Kumar, Sunil;Rawat, Ajay Kumar Singh;Kumar, Brijesh;
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. 77-86
424 views Abstract
2017
effect of calcium hydroxide mixed with different vehicles on the push-out bond strength of mineral trioxide aggregate
;Mohamad Frough Reyhani Reyhani;Vahid Zand;Mahlegha Izadimehr
Vol. 41 , No. 3 , pp. 219-226
415 views DOI Abstract
2011
مروری بر تومور پیندبورگ
;عطاءالله حبیبی
Vol. 35 , No. 3 , pp. 223-236
410 views Abstract
2018
Novel ligand-based docking; molecular dynamic simulations; and absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion approach to analyzing potential acetylcholinesterase inhibitors for Alzheimer's disease
Vijayakumar, Subramaniyan;Manogar, Palani;Prabhu, Srinivasan;Singh, Ram Avadhar Sanjeevkumar;
Vol. 8 , No. 6 , pp. 413-420
405 views Abstract
2017
ارزیابی سطح سرمی سلنیوم، منیزیوم، سدیم، روی و مس در بیماران با اختلالات مفصل گیجگاهی فکی
;اعظم السادات مدنی;امیر طاهر میر مرتضوی;علی اکبر شمسیان;عبدالله جوان;احسان بمانی
Vol. 41 , No. 2 , pp. 159-170
404 views DOI Abstract
2012
مقایسه سیل آپیکال سه نوع کانال سیلر ah26، ahplus و tubliseal در پر کردن کانال به روش تراکم جانبی
;محمدمهدی یاقوتی خراسانی;زهره سادات نوروززاده
Vol. 36 , No. 3 , pp. 249-258
396 views Abstract
2026
The Claims of Our Hearts
Keren Gorodeisky
DOI Abstract
2026
Some Objections to Phenomenal Conservatism about Inferential Justification
Weng Hong Tang
7 views DOI Abstract
2026
Phenomenal Conservatism as Epistemology of Logic: A Defence Against the Obscurity Objection
David Zuilhof
12 views DOI Abstract
2026
Dual Character Eliminativism
Lucien Baumgartner
26 views DOI Abstract
2026
Revisiting Roth’s Paradox of Historical Narratives
Jack Morgan Jones
27 views DOI Abstract
2026
Generative AI and a Sceptical Challenge to Digital Testimony
Ian M. Church
30 views DOI Abstract
2026
The Case for Normative Realism and The Case Against Normative Realism: Reply to Boghossian
Paul Boghossian, Matti Eklund
34 views DOI Abstract
2026
Irreducible Causal Powers and Compatibilism
Qichen Yan
38 views DOI Abstract
2026
A Note on Conditionals Between Lewis and Stalnaker
Yale Weiss
91 views DOI Abstract
2026
Mereological Supervenience
Gabriel Uzquiano
46 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
34.8/100 · Poor
Ranked #9,688 of 29,298 scored
(34,028 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

34.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

9.3/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

90.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

20.6/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.