Indexed in Journament

journal of pharmaceutical analysis

ISSN 2095-1779· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
40.3 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #7,880 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
48 Articles
Scores higher than 73.1% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

ชื่อย่อ j pharm anal
ชื่อตัวย่อ journal of pharmaceutical analysis
ISSN 2095-1779
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-pharmaceutical-analysis

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.7
Accessibility 20.0
Timeliness 90.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 5.7
Content Distribution 23.6
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for journal of pharmaceutical analysis
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.7 30.1
Accessibility 20.0 17.9
Timeliness 90.0 19.2
Diversity 28.8
Innovation 70.0 31.2
Community Impact 5.7 13.4
Content Distribution 23.6 88.4
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (48)

2010
مقایسه سی ساله تشخیص‏های بالینی و هیستوپاتولوژیک ضایعات غدد بزاقی، کیست‏ها و تومورهای ادنتوژنیک در دانشکده دندانپزشکی مشهد-ایران
Vol. 34 , No. 4 , pp. 299-308
468 views Abstract
2012
Two spectrophotometric methods for simultaneous determination of some antihyperlipidemic drugs.
Vol. 2 , No. 4 , pp. 279-284
445 views DOI Abstract
2016
Effects of urea, metal ions and surfactants on the binding of baicalein with bovine serum albumin
Vol. 6 , No. 4 , pp. 256-267
406 views Abstract
2017
Analysis of isoquinoline alkaloids from Mahonia leschenaultia and Mahonia napaulensis roots using UHPLC-Orbitrap-MSn and UHPLC-QqQLIT-MS/MS
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. 77-86
389 views Abstract
2017
In-depth investigation on physicochemical and thermal properties of magnesium (II) gluconate using spectroscopic and thermoanalytical techniques
Vol. 7 , No. 5 , pp. 332-337
389 views Abstract
2018
Novel ligand-based docking; molecular dynamic simulations; and absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion approach to analyzing potential acetylcholinesterase inhibitors for Alzheimer's disease
Vol. 8 , No. 6 , pp. 413-420
381 views Abstract
2017
effect of calcium hydroxide mixed with different vehicles on the push-out bond strength of mineral trioxide aggregate
Vol. 41 , No. 3 , pp. 219-226
378 views DOI Abstract
2011
مروری بر تومور پیندبورگ
Vol. 35 , No. 3 , pp. 223-236
378 views Abstract
2017
ارزیابی سطح سرمی سلنیوم، منیزیوم، سدیم، روی و مس در بیماران با اختلالات مفصل گیجگاهی فکی
Vol. 41 , No. 2 , pp. 159-170
363 views DOI Abstract
2012
مقایسه سیل آپیکال سه نوع کانال سیلر ah26، ahplus و tubliseal در پر کردن کانال به روش تراکم جانبی
Vol. 36 , No. 3 , pp. 249-258
344 views Abstract
2026
Mereological Supervenience
4 views DOI Abstract
2026
Recent Work on Manipulation
7 views DOI Abstract
2026
Terminological Takeover
8 views DOI Abstract
2026
Offsetting and Past Emissions
10 views DOI Abstract
2026
Précis of The Possibility of Moral Community
7 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
40.3/100 · Below Average
Ranked #7,880 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

40.3/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

5.7/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

90.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

23.6/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.