(Absolute) Generality and (Partial) Grounding

Clicks: 11
ID: 333673
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #59 of 61 articles by views in journal of pharmaceutical analysis

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract What constitutes a full ground for a general fact? Assuming its instances merely partially ground it, some argue that the fact consequently lacks a full ground (i.e., the instances constitute an incompletable partial ground). Others argue that a totality fact must therefore be added to complete the ground. I demonstrate that this debate rests on an ambiguity regarding the very concept of a general fact. Once disambiguated, we see that on one interpretation, the shared initial assumption is false, so both derived views are mistaken. On the other interpretation, the assumption holds, but both views remain viable.
Reference Key
openalex_W7223332200 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Davood Hosseini
Are you one of these authors? Claim your profile
Journal journal of pharmaceutical analysis
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/analys/anag081
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/anag081
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.