japanese journal of clinical oncology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#3887 / 33,981
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.1/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
75
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
38
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated منذ 6 أيام

japanese journal of clinical oncology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
الفهرسات
ncbi ulakbim sci
الاسم المختصر jpn j clin oncol
الاسم المختصر jpn j clin oncol
ISSN 1465-3621
الهدف والنطاق
URL
تعليمات المؤلفين

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (14 total)

2017
Leptomeningeal metastases of lung adenocarcinoma detected by 18F-FDG PET/CT.
Uslu Biner, Inci;Tatci, Ebru;Erdogan, Yurdanur;Demirag, Funda;Ozmen, Ozlem;
Vol. 47 , No. 9 , pp. 883-884
397 views DOI
2019
Post-marketing observational study of everolimus in patients with unresectable or metastatic renal cell carcinoma in Japan.
Akaza, Hideyuki;Kurihara, Ryohei;Katsura, Aiko;Harumiya, Miki;Ushida, Naoko;
362 views DOI Abstract
2020
Prognosis of BRCA1/2-negative breast cancer patients with HBOC risk factors compared with sporadic breast cancer patients without HBOC risk factors.
Ryu, Jai Min;Nam, Seok Jin;Kim, Seok Won;Lee, Jeong Eon;Chae, Byung Joo;Lee, Se Kyung;Yu, Jonghan;
348 views DOI Abstract
2019
Safety and effectiveness of bevacizumab in Japanese patients with malignant glioma: a post-marketing surveillance study.
Motoo, Nagane;Hayashi, Yasuko;Shimizu, Ayaka;Ura, Masako;Nishikawa, Ryo;
Vol. 49 , No. 11 , pp. 1016-1023
343 views DOI Abstract
2020
Radiotherapy for local recurrence of non-small-cell lung cancer after lobectomy and lymph node dissection-can local recurrence be radically cured by radiation?
Terada, Yukihiro;Isaka, Mitsuhiro;Harada, Hideyuki;Konno, Hayato;Kojima, Hideaki;Mizuno, Tetsuya;Murayama, Shigeyuki;Takahashi, Toshiaki;Ohde, Yasuhisa;
333 views DOI Abstract
2019
Prognosis viewing for nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy: application of nomogram and decision curve analysis.
Fei, Zhaodong;Qiu, Xiufang;Li, Mengying;Chen, Chuanben;Li, Yi;Huang, Yingying;
322 views DOI Abstract
2010
Primitive neuroectodermal tumors of adrenal gland.
Zhang, Yushi;Li, Hanzhong;
Vol. 40 , No. 8 , pp. 800-4
291 views DOI Abstract
2019
Issues associated with medical tourism for cancer care in Japan.
Awano, Nobuyasu;Takamoto, Takeshi;Kawakami, Junko;Genda, Atsuko;Ninomiya, Akiko;Ikeda, Misato;Matsuno, Fumie;Izumo, Takehiro;Kunitoh, Hideo;
Vol. 49 , No. 8 , pp. 708-713
273 views DOI Abstract
2026
Correction to: Public assistance and survival equality in patients with <i>EGFR</i> mutation-positive lung cancer
7 views DOI
2026
A multicenter randomized phase II/III trial of salvage treatment for refractory primary central nervous system lymphoma using tirabrutinib: JCOG2314 (ReSTART)
Kota Kawabata, Fumiharu Ohka, Ryuta Saito, Tsuyoshi Onoe, Hideyuki Harada, Takashi Sasayama, Hideaki Yokoo, Yoshiki Arakawa, Junki Mizusawa, Noriko Mitome, Keita Sasaki, Haruhiko Fukuda, Yoshitaka Narita
4 views DOI Abstract
View All 14 Articles
41
Overall
Below Average
31
15
30
40
38
75
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.1/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

38.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

75.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.