Indexed in Journament

japanese journal of clinical oncology

ISSN 1465-3621· EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
32.4 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #14,290 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
20 Articles
Scores higher than 51.2% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name jpn j clin oncol
Abbreviated Name jpn j clin oncol
ISSN 1465-3621

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.5
Timeliness 80.0
Diversity 5.6
Innovation 40.5
Community Impact 12.9
Content Distribution 27.8
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.5 30.4
Accessibility — 20.4
Timeliness 80.0 5.8
Diversity 5.6 24.4
Innovation 40.5 25.7
Community Impact 12.9 5.8
Content Distribution 27.8 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (20)

2017
Leptomeningeal metastases of lung adenocarcinoma detected by 18F-FDG PET/CT.
Uslu Biner, Inci;Tatci, Ebru;Erdogan, Yurdanur;Demirag, Funda;Ozmen, Ozlem;
Vol. 47 , No. 9 , pp. 883-884
454 views DOI
2019
Safety and effectiveness of bevacizumab in Japanese patients with malignant glioma: a post-marketing surveillance study.
Motoo, Nagane;Hayashi, Yasuko;Shimizu, Ayaka;Ura, Masako;Nishikawa, Ryo;
Vol. 49 , No. 11 , pp. 1016-1023
402 views DOI Abstract
2020
Prognosis of BRCA1/2-negative breast cancer patients with HBOC risk factors compared with sporadic breast cancer patients without HBOC risk factors.
Ryu, Jai Min;Nam, Seok Jin;Kim, Seok Won;Lee, Jeong Eon;Chae, Byung Joo;Lee, Se Kyung;Yu, Jonghan;
387 views DOI Abstract
2019
Post-marketing observational study of everolimus in patients with unresectable or metastatic renal cell carcinoma in Japan.
Akaza, Hideyuki;Kurihara, Ryohei;Katsura, Aiko;Harumiya, Miki;Ushida, Naoko;
383 views DOI Abstract
2020
Radiotherapy for local recurrence of non-small-cell lung cancer after lobectomy and lymph node dissection-can local recurrence be radically cured by radiation?
Terada, Yukihiro;Isaka, Mitsuhiro;Harada, Hideyuki;Konno, Hayato;Kojima, Hideaki;Mizuno, Tetsuya;Murayama, Shigeyuki;Takahashi, Toshiaki;Ohde, Yasuhisa;
369 views DOI Abstract
2019
Prognosis viewing for nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy: application of nomogram and decision curve analysis.
Fei, Zhaodong;Qiu, Xiufang;Li, Mengying;Chen, Chuanben;Li, Yi;Huang, Yingying;
361 views DOI Abstract
2010
Primitive neuroectodermal tumors of adrenal gland.
Zhang, Yushi;Li, Hanzhong;
Vol. 40 , No. 8 , pp. 800-4
328 views DOI Abstract
2019
Issues associated with medical tourism for cancer care in Japan.
Awano, Nobuyasu;Takamoto, Takeshi;Kawakami, Junko;Genda, Atsuko;Ninomiya, Akiko;Ikeda, Misato;Matsuno, Fumie;Izumo, Takehiro;Kunitoh, Hideo;
Vol. 49 , No. 8 , pp. 708-713
308 views DOI Abstract
2026
Correction to: Public assistance and survival equality in patients with <i>EGFR</i> mutation-positive lung cancer
34 views DOI
2026
Nomogram of conditional survival probability in oldest old patients with colorectal cancer after surgical resection: a multicenter retrospective cohort study
Kiyoaki Sugiura, Eiki Sato, Junya Aoyama, Norihiro Kishida, Hiroto Kikuchi, Koji Okabayashi, Satoshi Aiko, Yuko Kitagawa
30 views DOI Abstract
2026
Correction to: Suicide risk among individuals diagnosed with cancer during versus before the COVID-19 pandemic: a nationwide population-based study
DOI Abstract
2026
Identification of a prognostic signature based on expression of post-translational modification-related genes in acute myeloid leukemia
Donghui Gan, Jinfang Zeng, Jun Lin, Xiaojun Chen, Mengting Huang, Dan Weng, Jun Yan
25 views DOI Abstract
2026
Influence of pathologic fractures on oncologic outcomes in extremity Ewing sarcoma: a single-institution retrospective study
Hisaki Aiba, Ayano Aso, Alberto Righi, Marco Gambarotti, Paolo Spinnato, Eiji Nakata, Marco Focaccia, Giorgio Frega, HIROAKI KIMURA, Hideki Murakami, Davide María Donati, Costantino Errani
25 views DOI Abstract
2026
A clinical risk model predicts over 300 ILD-free days in urological cancer patients on immune checkpoint inhibitors
Shinro Hata, Satoki Abe, Hiroyuki Fujinami, Yoshiyasu Sato, Naoyuki Yamanaka, Toshitaka Shin
29 views DOI Abstract
2026
Nomogram of conditional survival probability in oldest old patients with colorectal cancer after surgical resection: a multicenter retrospective cohort study
Kiyoaki Sugiura, Eiki Sato, Junya Aoyama, Norihiro Kishida, Hiroto Kikuchi, Koji Okabayashi, Satoshi Aiko, Yuko Kitagawa
30 views DOI Abstract
2026
Is female breast cancer mortality in Japan declining or still increasing? A request for clarification
Takayoshi Uematsu
28 views DOI
2026
Triplet therapy with darolutamide and docetaxel for metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer: a multicenter real-world study
Ibuki Tsuru, Satoru Taguchi, Ryo Tanaka, Taketo Kawai, Tomoyuki Kaneko, Yu Nakamura, Yoshifumi Miyauchi, Hayato Hoshina, Daisuke Obinata, Masashi Koshiba, Masashi Shiozaki, Jun Takahashi, Masato Kano, Akihiro Naito, Shohei Suda, Michio Noda, Nozomi Sugiyama, Takehiro Tanaka, Yukari Uemura, Jimpei Miyakawa, Jun Kamei, Shigenori Kakutani, Aya Niimi, Yuta Yamada, Yusuke Sato, Yukio Yamada, Hiroaki Nishimatsu, Takashi Murata, Sayuri Takahashi, Tappei Takada, Yoshiyuki Akiyama, Satoru Takahashi, Tetsuya Fujimura, Hiroshi Fukuhara, Tohru Nakagawa, Haruki Kume
23 views DOI Abstract
2026
Characterization of distant metastases in salivary gland cancer patients undergoing upfront surgery followed by postoperative radiation therapy: a multicenter analysis
Dong Soo Lee, Min Kyu Kang, Chang Geol Lee, Ki Chang Keum, Seung Yeun Chung, Tae Hyung Kim, Hong-Gyun Wu, Jin Ho Kim, Sung Ho Moon, Ki Mun Kang, Young-Taek Oh, Jae‐Joong Kim
24 views DOI Abstract
2026
Age-standardized mortality-to-incidence ratio for lymphoma in the world
Kumiko Saika, Laureline Gatellier
26 views DOI
2026
A Lynch syndrome patient with multiple cancers who was found to have a novel pathogenic variant generating aberrant splicing of <i>MLH1</i>
Ayumi Abe, Hidetaka Eguchi, Kimio Matsumura, Yudai Fukui, Kosuke Hiramatsu, Takeshi Fujii, Masako Ikemura, Gaku Kuge, Hiroya Kuroyanagi, Yasushi Okazaki, Masami Arai
24 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
32.4/100 · Poor
Ranked #14,290 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

32.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

12.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

80.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

27.8/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.