Real-world incidence of interstitial lung disease with enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab or enfortumab vedotin monotherapy in metastatic urothelial carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective study in Japan

Clicks: 11
ID: 337698
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #24 of 26 articles by views in japanese journal of clinical oncology

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Background Enfortumab vedotin (EV) plus pembrolizumab is a standard first-line therapy for locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a potentially serious adverse event (AE) associated with these therapies. We compared the incidence of ILD between EV monotherapy and enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab in Japanese clinical practice. Methods This multicenter retrospective study included patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma treated with EV or EV plus pembrolizumab at five Japanese institutions. AEs, particularly ILD, were compared between the two groups. Factors associated with ILD development were evaluated using Firth penalized logistic regression. Results Among 141 patients, 81 received EV and 60 received EV plus pembrolizumab. Grade ≥ 3 AEs were more frequent with the combination (27% vs. 10%, P = .0106). ILD occurred significantly more frequently in the combination (12% vs. 2%, P = .0272). Grade ≥3 ILD occurred in 8% versus 2% (P = .11). In Firth penalized logistic regression analysis adjusted for age and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, the combination was associated with ILD (adjusted odds ratio, 5.47; 95% confidence interval, 1.32–32.3; P = .0134). Conclusions In this retrospective Japanese cohort, ILD was observed more frequently in patients receiving enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab than in those receiving enfortumab vedotin monotherapy. Careful monitoring and early recognition of ILD are warranted during combination therapy.
Reference Key
openalex_W7224399475 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal japanese journal of clinical oncology
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/jjco/hyag183
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.