Triplet therapy with darolutamide and docetaxel for metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer: a multicenter real-world study
Clicks: 8
ID: 320276
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
0.0
/100
0 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
Abstract Background Triplet therapy with darolutamide and docetaxel has reshaped the treatment landscape of metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC). However, real-world evidence regarding its oncological outcomes and toxicity remains limited. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 112 consecutive patients with mCSPC who were treated with triplet therapy. A deep prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response was defined as a PSA level < 0.2 ng/ml or a ≥ 90% decline from baseline. Castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC)-free survival was used as the survival endpoint. Clinicopathological factors associated with CRPC-free survival were analysed using a Cox proportional hazards model. Treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were comprehensively documented by type and grade. Results During a median follow-up of 17.1 months, 15 patients developed CRPC and four died of prostate cancer; 1-year CRPC-free survival and overall survival rates were 89.8% (95% confidence interval, 83.9%–96.0%) and 98.8% (96.5%–100%), respectively. A deep PSA response was achieved in 73.2% of patients (PSA nadir <0.2 ng/ml) and in 96.4% (PSA ≥ 90% decline). In both the univariable and multivariable analyses, no baseline factor was significantly associated with CRPC-free survival. Grade ≥ 3 hematologic AEs occurred in 75.0% of patients. Among the 31 patients who discontinued docetaxel, 26 discontinued due to non-hematologic AEs. Conclusions Triplet therapy demonstrated substantial clinical activity in real-world patients with mCSPC, with high rates of deep PSA response despite frequent AEs. These findings support the feasibility of triplet therapy in routine practice. Given the substantial toxicity burden, careful patient selection and proactive AE management remain important.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7167839670
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Ibuki Tsuru, Satoru Taguchi, Ryo Tanaka, Taketo Kawai, Tomoyuki Kaneko, Yu Nakamura, Yoshifumi Miyauchi, Hayato Hoshina, Daisuke Obinata, Masashi Koshiba, Masashi Shiozaki, Jun Takahashi, Masato Kano, Akihiro Naito, Shohei Suda, Michio Noda, Nozomi Sugiyama, Takehiro Tanaka, Yukari Uemura, Jimpei Miyakawa, Jun Kamei, Shigenori Kakutani, Aya Niimi, Yuta Yamada, Yusuke Sato, Yukio Yamada, Hiroaki Nishimatsu, Takashi Murata, Sayuri Takahashi, Tappei Takada, Yoshiyuki Akiyama, Satoru Takahashi, Tetsuya Fujimura, Hiroshi Fukuhara, Tohru Nakagawa, Haruki Kume |
| Journal | japanese journal of clinical oncology |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/jjco/hyag110
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.