brazilian archives of biology and technology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2192 / 33,939
📉 Poor
Overall Score
37.3/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

brazilian archives of biology and technology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
doaj
Short Name brazilian archives of biology and technology
Abbreviated Name brazilian archives of biology and technology
ISSN 1516-8913
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.scielo.br/j/babt
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (64 total)

2018
Characterization of grid-connected photovoltaic systems in Curitiba, Brazil
Tonin, Fabianna Stumpf;Junior, Jair Urbanetz;
Vol. 61 , No. spe , pp. -
434 views Abstract
2014
Effect of biologically treated petroleum sludge on seed germination and seedling growth of Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. (Fabaceae)
Sangeetha, Jeyabalan;Thangadurai, Devarajan;
Vol. 57 , No. 3 , pp. 427-433
367 views Abstract
2015
In vitro cytotoxic, genotoxic and antioxidant/oxidant effects of guaiazulene on human lymphocytes
Toğar, Başak;Çelik, Kübra;Türkez, Hasan;
Vol. 58 , No. 1 , pp. 61-67
333 views Abstract
2004
Occurrence and parasitism of aphids (Hemiptera: Aphididae) on cultivars of irrigated oat (Avena spp.) in São Carlos, Brazil
Ronquim, Júlio Cesar;Pacheco, Josué Marques;Ronquim, Carlos Cesar;
Vol. 47 , No. 2 , pp. 163-169
318 views Abstract
2005
123-I ioflupane (Datscan®) presynaptic nigrostriatal imaging in patients with movement disorders
Castrejón, Angel Soriano;Vicente, Ana María García;Romera, Montserrat Cortés;Cano, Julia Vaamonde;Marina, Sonia Rodado;García, Victor Manuel Poblete;Solís, Sebastián Ruiz;Rubio, María del Prado Talavera;
Vol. 48 , No. spe2 , pp. 115-126
312 views Abstract
2013
the role of the family in the revitalization of a minority language
;Delyth Morris
, No. 53 , pp. 149-165
309 views DOI Abstract
2011
Extra-cellular isoamylase production by Rhizopus oryzae in solid-state fermentation of agro wastes
Ghosh, Barnita;Ray, Rina Rani;
Vol. 54 , No. 5 , pp. 867-876
282 views Abstract
2009
The influence of freezing rates on bovine pericardium tissue Freeze-drying
Borgognoni, Camila Figueiredo;Junior, Virgilio Tattini;Ayrosa, Ana Maria Irene Bartolomeu;Polakiewicz, Bronislaw;Leirner, Adolfo Alberto;Maizato, Marina Junko Shiotsu;Higa, Olga Zazuco;Beppu, Marisa Masumi;Pitombo, Ronaldo Nogueira de Moraes;
Vol. 52 , No. 6 , pp. 1493-1504
270 views Abstract
2017
Gene Expression Analyses of HER-2/neu and ESR1 in Patients with Breast Cancer
Nadergoli, Omid Kheyri;Feizi, Mohammad Ali Hosseinpour;Kafil, Hossein Samadi;Pouladi, Nasser;Hosseinzadeh, Ali;Rostamizadeh, Leila;Montazeri, Vahid;Fakhrjou, Ashraf;Sakhinia, Ebrahim;Seifi, Morteza;
Vol. 60 , pp. -
268 views Abstract
2014
metaficció irònica a «estremida memòria», de jesús moncada
;Carme Gregori Soldevila
, No. 41 , pp. 131-150
245 views DOI Abstract
View All 64 Articles
37
Overall
Poor
30
35
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.