ieee transactions on bio-medical engineering | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2360 / 33,971
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

ieee transactions on bio-medical engineering

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name ieee trans biomed eng
Abbreviated Name ieee trans biomed eng
ISSN 1558-2531
Aim and Scope
URL https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/RecentIssue.jsp?punumber=10
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (16 total)

1991
Reconstruction of sequential cardiac in-plane displacement patterns on the chest wall by laser speckle interferometry
Singh M;Ramachandran G;;
Vol. 38 , No. 5 , pp. -
479 views Abstract
2019
A Novel Framework for Estimating Time-Varying Multivariate Autoregressive Models and Application to Cardiovascular Responses to Acute Exercise.
Kostoglou, Kyriaki;Robertson, Andrew D;MacIntosh, Bradley J;Mitsis, Georgios D;
Vol. 66 , No. 11 , pp. 3257-3266
415 views DOI Abstract
2010
A principal component regression approach for estimation of ventricular repolarization characteristics.
Lipponen, Jukka Antero;Tarvainen, Mika P;Laitinen, Tomi;Lyyra-Laitinen, Tiina;Karjalainen, Pasi A;
Vol. 57 , No. 5 , pp. 1062-9
393 views DOI Abstract
2002
Confocal microwave imaging for breast cancer detection: localization of tumors in three dimensions
Fear EC;Li X;Hagness SC;Stuchly MA;;
Vol. 49 , No. 8 , pp. -
382 views Abstract
2018
Robust Methods for Automated Selection of Cardiac Signals After Blind Source Separation.
Wedekind, Daniel;Kleyko, Denis;Osipov, Evgeny;Malberg, Hagen;Zaunseder, Sebastian;Wiklund, Urban;
Vol. 65 , No. 10 , pp. 2248-2258
329 views DOI Abstract
2019
Blind Source Separation on Non-contact Heartbeat Detection by Non-negative Matrix Factorization Algorithms.
Ye, Chen;Toyoda, Kentaroh;Ohtsuki, Tomoaki;
327 views DOI Abstract
2013
Compressed sensing for energy-efficient wireless telemonitoring of noninvasive fetal ECG via block sparse Bayesian learning.
Zhang, Zhilin;Jung, Tzyy-Ping;Makeig, Scott;Rao, Bhaskar D;
Vol. 60 , No. 2 , pp. 300-9
309 views DOI Abstract
2019
A Palm-Sized Cryoprobe System with a Built-in Thermocouple and Its Application in an Animal Model of Epilepsy.
Tokiwa, Tatsuji;Zimin, Lev;Ishiguro, Hiroshi;Inoue, Takao;Kajigaya, Hiroshi;Nomura, Sadahiro;Suzuki, Michiyasu;Yamakawa, Takeshi;
294 views DOI Abstract
2018
Compression of Steganographed PPG Signal with Guaranteed Reconstruction Quality Based on Optimum Truncation of Singular Values and ASCII Character Encoding.
Mukhopadhyay, Sourav Kumar;Ahmad, M Omair;Swamy, M N S;
290 views DOI Abstract
2019
Specific, non-invasive and magnetically-directed targeting of magnetic erythrocytes in blood vessels of mice.
Cai, Qingdong;Sun, Jianfei;Mai, Xiaoli;Miao, Wanlin;Zhou, Xin;Zhang, Yu;Liu, Xuan;Lu, Wei;Zhang, Jianqiong;Gu, Ning;
271 views DOI Abstract
View All 16 Articles
42
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.8/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.