Natural product research | Journament

Journal Ranking

#105 / 33,718
πŸ“Š Below Average
Overall Score
41.2/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
45
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
30
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 months ago

Natural product research

Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • βœ… Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • βœ… Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • βœ… No iframe limitations
  • βœ… Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • βœ… Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • βœ… Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi
Short Name Nat Prod Res
Abbreviated Name nat prod res
ISSN 1478-6427
Aim and Scope The aim of Natural Product Research is to publish important contributions in the field of natural product chemistry. The journal covers all aspects of research in the chemistry and biochemistry of naturally occurring compounds. The communications include coverage of work on natural substances of land and sea and of plants, microbes and animals. Discussions of structure elucidation, synthesis and experimental biosynthesis of natural products as well as developments of methods in these areas are welcomed in the journal. Finally, research papers in fields on the chemistry-biology boundary, eg. fermentation chemistry, plant tissue culture investigations etc., are accepted into the journal. Natural Product Research issues will be subtitled either "Part A - Synthesis and Structure" or "Part B - Bioactive Natural Products". for details on this , see the forthcoming articles section. All manuscript submissions are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor, and, if found suitable for further consideration, to peer review by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is single blind and submission is online via ScholarOne Manuscripts. Peer Review Policy All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor. If found suitable for further consideration, papers are subject to peer review by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is single blind and submissions can be made online at http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/gnpl. Publishing Ethics The Journal adheres to the highest standards of publishing ethics, with rigorous processes in place to ensure this is achieved. Taylor & Francis is a member of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and utilises CrossCheck for all Journals. More information on our ethical standards and policies can be found here: http://authorservices.taylorandfrancis.com/ethics-for-authors/
URL https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/gnpl20/current
Author Instructions https://www.tandfonline.com/action/authorSubmission?show=instructions&journalCode=gnpl20

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (83 total)

2007
Antioxidant activity and total phenolic content of aqueous and methanolic extracts of Jordanian plants: an ICBG project
Alali, Feras Q.;Tawaha, Khaled;El-Elimat, Tamam;Syouf, Maha;El-Fayad, Mosa;Abulaila, Khaled;Nielsen, Samara Joy;Wheaton, William D.;Iii, Joseph O. Falkinham;Oberlies, Nicholas H.
Vol. 21 , No. 12 , pp. 1121-1131
722 views
2010
Antimicrobial activity and chemical composition of endemic Centaurea cariensis subsp. niveo-tomentosa
Ugur, Aysel;Sarac, Nurdan;Ceylan, Ozgur;Emin Duru, M.
Vol. 24 , No. 9 , pp. 861-872
430 views
2019
Antifungal and antimycotoxigenic metabolites from native plants of northwest Argentina: isolation, identification and potential for control of Aspergillus species
Gomez, A.
, pp. 0-0
376 views DOI
2010
Influence of environmental factors on composition of phenolic antioxidants of Achillea collina Becker ex Rchb
Giorgi, Annamaria;Madeo, Moira;Speranza, Giovanna;Cocucci, Maurizio
Vol. 24 , No. 16 , pp. 1546-1559
371 views
2019
Structure determination and quantification of a new flavone glycoside with anti-acetylcholinesterase activity from the herbs of Elsholtzia ciliata
Nugroho A.
Vol. 33 , pp. 814-821
344 views DOI
2005
Volatile components of Centaurea eryngioides Lam. and Centaurea iberica Trev. var. hermonis Boiss. Lam., two Asteraceae growing wild in Lebanon
Senatore, Felice;Arnold, Nelly Apostolides;Bruno, Maurizio
Vol. 19 , No. 8 , pp. 749-754
338 views
2019
Determination of natural phenolic compounds of Ferula longipedunculata Peşmen and assessment their antioxidant and anticholinesterase potentials
Karakaya S.
, pp. 0-0
330 views DOI
2019
Synthesis of podophyllotoxin-glycosyl triazoles click protocol mediated by silver (I)--heterocyclic carbenes and their anticancer evaluation as topoisomerase-II inhibitors.
Nerella, Srinivas;Kankala, Shravankumar;Gavaji, Brahmeshwari;
, pp. 1-8
328 views DOI Abstract
2019
A quinoline alkaloid rich floral extract enhances the bioactivity.
Rout, Prasant Kumar;Kumar, Prashant;Rao, Y Ramachandra;Kumar, Anant;Bawankule, Dnyaneshwar U;Singh, Ruchi;Singh, Kijay Bahadur;Chanotiya, Chandan Singh;Naik, S N;
, pp. 1-7
325 views DOI Abstract
2019
Secondary metabolites produced by endophytic Pantoea ananatis derived from roots of Baccharoides anthelmintica and their effect on melanin synthesis in murine B16 cells.
Rustamova, Nigora;Bobakulov, Khayrulla;Begmatov, Nurmirza;Turak, Ablajan;Yili, Abulimiti;Aisa, Haji Akber;
, pp. 1-6
313 views DOI Abstract
View All 83 Articles
41
Overall
Below Average
30
45
30
40
30
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.2/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

45.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

30.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.