journal of aoac international | Journament

Journal Ranking

#20 / 33,939
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
46.2/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
90
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
39
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 10 hours ago

journal of aoac international

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi
Short Name j aoac int
Abbreviated Name j aoac int
ISSN 1060-3271
Aim and Scope
URL http://www.aoac.org/pubs/jaoac.htm
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (324 total)

2018
Development of Lateral Flow Immunochromatographic Strips for Micropollutant Screening Using Colorants of Aptamer-Functionalized Nanogold Particles, Part II: Experimental Verification with Aflatoxin B1 and Chloramphenicol.
Zhang, Shan;Zhao, Shuai;Wang, Sai;Liu, Jiahui;Dong, Yiyang;
Vol. 101 , No. 5 , pp. 1408-1414
447 views DOI Abstract
2015
choline and cystine deficient diets in animal models with hepatocellular injury: evaluation of oxidative stress and expression of rage, tnf-α, and il-1β
;Juliana Célia F. Santos;Orlando R. P. de Araújo;Iara B. Valentim;Kívia Queiroz de Andrade;Fabiana Andréa Moura;Salete Smaniotto;John Marques dos Santos;Juciano Gasparotto;Daniel P. Gelain;Marília O. F. Goulart
Vol. 2015 , pp. -
388 views DOI Abstract
2019
Modified Magnetic Nanoparticle-Based Solid-Phase Extraction for the Determination of Trace Amounts of Aflatoxins B and B₂ in Chinese Patent Medicines: The Use of Fupuganmao Granules as a Case Study.
Li, Qing;Jiang, Luyi;Zhang, Huan;Wei, Mengmeng;Chu, Chu;Yan, Jizhong;
Vol. 102 , No. 3 , pp. 761-766
366 views DOI Abstract
2019
The BIPM Mycotoxin Metrology Capacity Building and Knowledge Transfer Program: Accurate Characterization of a Pure Aflatoxin B Material to Avoid Calibration Errors.
Josephs, Ralf D;Li, Xiaomin;Li, Xiuqin;Guo, Zhen;Garrido, Bruno;Un, Ilker;Daireaux, Adeline;Choteau, Tiphaine;Martos, Gustavo;Westwood, Steven;Li, Hongmei;Wielgosz, Robert I;
362 views DOI Abstract
2019
TLC-Bioautographic Evaluation for High-Throughput Screening and Identification of Free Radical Scavenging and Antidiabetic Compounds from Traditional Unani Medicinal Plant: Schrad.
Parveen, Rabea;Khan, Nausheen;Zahiruddin, Sultan;Ibrahim, Mohammad;Anjum, Varisha;Parveen, Bushra;Khan, Mohammad Ahmad;
349 views DOI Abstract
2019
Application of Chemometrics for Spectral Resolving and Determination of Three Analgesics in Water Samples.
Yehia, Ali M;Elbalkiny, Heba T;Riad, Safa'a M;Elsaharty, Yasser S;
342 views DOI Abstract
2019
The Interannual Evolution of PAHs in Columnar Sediments in Offshore Area of Changxing Island Industrial Zone, China.
Ping, Tao;Shuang, Xu;Yi, Wei;Shuguang, Guo;Lijun, Tang;Mihua, Shao;Chengwen, Song;
338 views DOI Abstract
2011
chopper is prodeath regardless of the effect of p75icd on sensitivity to oxidative stress
;Alliya Qazi;Marc W. Halterman;Zhiping Mi;Tong Zhang;Nina F. Schor
Vol. 2011 , pp. -
336 views DOI Abstract
Simultaneous determination of a ternary mixture of doxylamine succinate, pyridoxine hydrochloride, and folic acid by the ratio spectra-zero-crossing, double divisor-ratio spectra derivative, and column high-performance liquid chromatographic methods.
Pathak, Ashutosh;Rajput, Sadhana J;
Vol. 91 , No. 5 , pp. 1059-69
320 views Abstract
2017
Multilaboratory Validation of First Action Method 2016.04 for Determination of Four Arsenic Species in Fruit Juice by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography-Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry.
Kubachka, Kevin;Heitkemper, Douglas T;Conklin, Sean;
Vol. 100 , No. 4 , pp. 1077-1085
304 views DOI Abstract
View All 324 Articles
46
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
39
90
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

46.2/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

38.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

90.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.