Evaluation of Three Automated Pretreatment Workstations for Free Silica Determination

Clicks: 16
ID: 332104
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #345 of 374 articles by views in journal of aoac international

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 374 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract Background In China, pneumoconioses accounted for 64.23% of newly reported occupational disease cases in 2024. Silicosis, one of the most common and severe forms of pneumoconiosis, is caused by inhalation of free crystalline silica (SiO₂), highlighting the continued importance of accurate free silica determination. The pyrophosphoric acid (PPA) method (GBZ/T 192.4-2007) predominates in China, but manual operation exposes analysts to hazardous reagents and operator-dependent variability. No comparative evaluation of automated workstations has been published. Objective To evaluate three automated free silica pretreatment workstations and their agreement with the manual method. Methods Three workstations (A, B and C) were evaluated with a common protocol in terms of repeatability and trueness on reference and quality control materials, inter-day precision over five days, and agreement with the manual method on field samples by Bland-Altman analysis. Results Repeatability RSDs (n = 10–12) were 3.5–10.1% at 2.3–5.8% or 9.1%, 2.9–4.8% at 13.0–20.4%, 2.2–2.5% at 58.6–71.6% and 0.5–0.8% at ≥ 99.76% (quartz sand). HorRat exceeded 1.3 in 8 of 13 repeatability or inter-day combinations below 50% free silica and in none at ≥ 60%. Inter-day RSDs were 1.4–4.2% at 15–67% and 0.2–0.8% at 99% free silica. Means lay within the certified value or reference ranges but 0.4–0.9 points below the quartz sand’s nominal content. On field samples, mean differences from the manual method were −1.5 to + 0.5 percentage points (not significant), and all 95% limits of agreement lay within ±8 percentage points. Conclusion All three workstations are safe, reliable alternatives to manual PPA digestion and agreed with the manual method on field samples. Highlights To our knowledge, the first evaluation of three automated free silica pretreatment workstations with a common protocol; repeatability and trueness characterized over 2–100% free silica; no significant bias relative to the manual method on field samples.
Reference Key
openalex_W7221448179 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Jiping Su, Wei Yang, Ruifeng Zheng, Ruirui Dai
Journal journal of aoac international
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/jaoacint/qsag093
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/jaoacint/qsag093
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.