drugs & aging | Journament

Journal Ranking

#279 / 33,784
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
75
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 7 hours ago

drugs & aging

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name drugs aging
Abbreviated Name drugs aging
ISSN 1179-1969
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions
Added by Said Nadeem on Jul 03, 2019

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (15 total)

2019
Use of Cholinesterase Inhibitors in Non-Alzheimer's Dementias.
Noufi, Paul;Khoury, Rita;Jeyakumar, Sajeeka;Grossberg, George T;
308 views DOI Abstract
2014
criança e apreensão do sentido: experiência midiática televisiva como construção de identidades
;Carolina Fernandes da Silva Mandaji
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. 40-56
303 views DOI Abstract
2016
Structured Pharmacist Review of Medication in Older Hospitalised Patients: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
Gallagher, James;O'Sullivan, David;McCarthy, Suzanne;Gillespie, Paddy;Woods, Noel;O'Mahony, Denis;Byrne, Stephen;
Vol. 33 , No. 4 , pp. 285-94
289 views DOI Abstract
2019
Use of Medications with Anticholinergic Properties and the Long-Term Risk of Hospitalization for Falls and Fractures in the EPIC-Norfolk Longitudinal Cohort Study.
Tan, Maw Pin;Tan, Guo Jeng;Mat, Sumaiyah;Luben, Robert N;Wareham, Nicholas J;Khaw, Kay-Tee;Myint, Phyo Kyaw;
273 views DOI Abstract
2016
comunicação estratégica e mídias sociais para gestão de crise – um estudo sobre a vale s.a.
;Jéssica de Cássia Rossi;Ana Carolina Trindade
Vol. 4 , No. 7 , pp. 82-93
234 views DOI Abstract
2018
Efficacy of Umeclidinium/Vilanterol in Elderly Patients with COPD: A Pooled Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Ray, Riju;Tombs, Lee;Asmus, Michael J;Boucot, Isabelle;Lipson, David A;Compton, Chris;Naya, Ian;
Vol. 35 , No. 7 , pp. 637-647
221 views DOI Abstract
2015
Lenalidomide: a review of its continuous use in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma not eligible for stem-cell transplantation
McCormack PL;;
Vol. 32 , No. 5 , pp. -
215 views Abstract
2014
underground e ciberespaço: uma leitura atual para estudos da comunicação
;Guilherme Carvalho;Máira Nunes
Vol. 2 , No. 3 , pp. 201-216
176 views DOI Abstract
2015
estratÉgias das candidaturas presidenciais brasileiras em 2010
;Luciana Panke
Vol. 3 , No. 4 , pp. 6-28
140 views Abstract
2014
corpos protéticos e corpos remodelados: elementos da cibercultura em anúncios publicitários de moda feminina na revista elle
;Adriana Tulio Baggio
Vol. 2 , No. 3 , pp. 170-184
109 views DOI Abstract
View All 15 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
36
75
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

75.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.