early childhood research quarterly | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2777 / 33,958
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.4/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
33
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 6 days ago

early childhood research quarterly

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ulakbim soc
Short Name early child res q
Abbreviated Name early childhood research quarterly
ISSN 0885-2006
Aim and Scope
URL http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/620184/description#description
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (21 total)

2019
Correlates of reading comprehension and word-problem solving skills of Spanish-speaking dual language learners
Goodrich, J.
Vol. 48 , pp. 256-266
343 views DOI
2020
Forty years of measuring quality with the Environment Rating Scales
Clifford, R.
Vol. 51 , pp. 164-166
243 views DOI
Effects of Web-Mediated Professional Development Resources on Teacher-Child Interactions in Pre-Kindergarten Classrooms.
Pianta, Robert C;Mashburn, Andrew J;Downer, Jason T;Hamre, Bridget K;Justice, Laura;
Vol. 23 , No. 4 , pp. 431-451
237 views Abstract
2019
Students with disabilities attending full-day versus part-day kindergarten: Short- and long-term effects on achievement
Gottfried, M.
Vol. 49 , pp. 175-187
236 views DOI
2020
Measurement invariance of the English and Spanish BASC-3 behavioral and emotional screening system parent preschool forms
Edyburn, K.
Vol. 51 , pp. 307-316
233 views DOI
2019
Teachers’ relatedness with students as a predictor of students’ intrinsic motivation, self-concept, and reading achievement
Guay, F.
Vol. 48 , pp. 215-225
231 views DOI
2020
Trends in preschool attendance in Australia following major policy reform: Updated evidence six years following a commitment to universal access
O'Connor, M.
Vol. 51 , pp. 93-99
225 views DOI
2020
Parent migration and rural preschool children's early academic and social skill trajectories in China: Are ‘left-behind’ children really left behind?
Hu, B.
Vol. 51 , pp. 317-328
223 views DOI
2020
Text messaging as an enhancement to home visiting: Building parents’ capacity to improve child language-learning environments
Bigelow, K.
Vol. 51 , pp. 416-429
223 views DOI
2020
Teacher fidelity to Conscious Discipline and children's executive function skills
Anderson, K.
Vol. 51 , pp. 14-25
211 views DOI
View All 21 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
33
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.