perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the association for psychological science | Journament

Journal Ranking

#5111 / 33,971
📉 Poor
Overall Score
36.9/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
33
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the association for psychological science

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name perspect psychol sci
Abbreviated Name perspect psychol sci
ISSN 1745-6924
Aim and Scope
URL http://www.sagepub.com/journals/Journal201964/title
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (20 total)

2019
Social Ambivalence and Disease (SAD): A Theoretical Model Aimed at Understanding the Health Implications of Ambivalent Relationships.
Holt-Lunstad, Julianne;Uchino, Bert N;
, pp. 1745691619861392
387 views DOI Abstract
2015
Video Games Do Indeed Influence Children and Adolescents' Aggression, Prosocial Behavior, and Academic Performance: A Clearer Reading of Ferguson (2015).
Boxer, Paul;Groves, Christopher L;Docherty, Meagan;
Vol. 10 , No. 5 , pp. 671-3
376 views DOI Abstract
2019
Finding Common Ground in Meta-Analysis "Wars" on Violent Video Games.
Mathur, Maya B;VanderWeele, Tyler J;
Vol. 14 , No. 4 , pp. 705-708
318 views DOI Abstract
2006
Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth After 35 Years: Uncovering Antecedents for the Development of Math-Science Expertise.
Lubinski, David;Benbow, Camilla Persson;
Vol. 1 , No. 4 , pp. 316-45
314 views DOI Abstract
2019
Specificity of Future Thinking in Depression: A Meta-Analysis.
Gamble, Beau;Moreau, David;Tippett, Lynette J;Addis, Donna Rose;
Vol. 14 , No. 5 , pp. 816-834
254 views DOI Abstract
2011
polazne crte u sredozemnome moru : s posebnim osvrtom na pitanje korekcije ravnih polaznih crta republike hrvatske
;Marina Vokić Žužul;Valerija Filipović
Vol. 50 , No. 165 , pp. 1-73
252 views Abstract
2010
količinski ugovori prema rotterdamskim pravilima
;Vesna Polić Foglar
Vol. 49 , No. 164 , pp. 211-222
247 views Abstract
2007
prijevoz stvari u unutarnjoj plovidbi u hrvatskoj - de lege ferenda
;Ivo Grabovac
Vol. 46 , No. 161 , pp. 3-11
232 views Abstract
2001
problematika međunarodne regulative prijevoza stvari morem : (prijedlog unifikacijskog usklađivanja)
;Ivo Grabovac;Dragan Bolanča
Vol. 40 , No. 155 , pp. 33-56
219 views Abstract
2014
novine u zakonu o prijevozu u linijskom i povremenom obalnom pomorskom prometu iz 2013. godine
;Nikola Mandić;Petra Amižić Jelovčić
Vol. 53 , No. 168 , pp. 127-142
160 views Abstract
View All 20 Articles
37
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
33
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

36.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

32.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.