Specificity of Future Thinking in Depression: A Meta-Analysis.
Clicks: 310
ID: 48566
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
63.9
/100
310 views
196 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #5 of 20 articles by views in perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the association for psychological science
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Reduced specificity of autobiographical memory has been well established in depression, but whether this extends to future thinking has not been the focus of a meta-analysis. Following a preregistered protocol, we searched six electronic databases, Google Scholar, and personal libraries and contacted authors in the field for studies matching search terms related to depression, future thinking, and specificity. We reduced an initial 7,332 results to 46 included studies, with 89 effect sizes and 4,813 total participants. Random-effects meta-analytic modeling revealed a small but robust correlation between reduced future specificity and higher levels of depression ( = -.13, < .001). Of the 11 moderator variables examined, the most striking effects were related to the emotional valence of future thinking ( < .001) and the sex of participants ( = .025). Namely, depression was linked to reduced specificity for positive (but not negative or neutral) future thinking, and the relationship was stronger in samples with a higher proportion of males. This meta-analysis contributes to our understanding of how prospection is altered in depression and dysphoria and, by revealing areas where current evidence is inconclusive, highlights key avenues for future research.
| Reference Key |
gamble2019specificityperspectives
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Gamble, Beau;Moreau, David;Tippett, Lynette J;Addis, Donna Rose; |
| Journal | perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the association for psychological science |
| Year | 2019 |
| DOI |
10.1177/1745691619851784
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.