Indexed in Journament

cuadernos de herpetología

ISSN 0326-551X· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
33.5 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #11,705 of 29,298 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
49 Articles
Scores higher than 60% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name cuadernos de herpetología
Abbreviated Name cuadernos de herpetología
ISSN 0326-551X
URL http://ppct.caicyt.gov.ar/index.php/cuadherpetol

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.6
Accessibility 20.0
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 5.0
Content Distribution 67.7
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.6 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 20.4
Timeliness 0.0 5.8
Diversity — 24.5
Innovation 70.0 25.7
Community Impact 5.0 5.8
Content Distribution 67.7 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (49)

2009
the magic cube of eaccounting — instructional design in management education
;Silvia Maria Pernsteiner;Michaela Maria Schaffhauser-Linzatti;Regina Michaski-Karl
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. 48-51
391 views DOI Abstract
2009
actualization of learning by developing (lbd): an analysis
;Rauno Ilmari Pirinen
Vol. 4 , No. SI3 , pp. 46-58
387 views DOI Abstract
2018
influence factors of satisfaction with mobile learning app: an empirical analysis of china
;Liqiong Liu;Liyi Zhang;Pinghao Ye;Qihua Liu
Vol. 13 , No. 03 , pp. 87-99
381 views DOI Abstract
2010
report of the results of an ims learning design expert workshop
;Dai Griffiths;Michael Klebl;Susanne Neumann;Davinia Hernández-Leo;Luis de la Fuente Valentín;Hans Hummel;Francis Brouns;Michael Derntl;Petra Oberhuemer
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 58-72
373 views DOI Abstract
2008
a pilot project – from illiteracy to computer literacy: teaching and learning using information technology
;Mohamad Adnan Al-Alaoui;Mesrob I. Ohannessian;Ghinwa F. Choueiter;Christine Akl;T. Taline Avakian;Ismail Al-Kamal;Rony Ferzli
Vol. 3 , No. 3 , pp. 4-9
364 views Abstract
2000
Distribución geográfica de Boa constrictor occidentalis Linnaeus, 1758 (Serpentes: Boidae)
Carlos, Acosta, Juan;Javier, Ávila, Luciano;
Vol. 14 , No. 2 , pp. 163-163
355 views Abstract
2014
e-learning and benchmarking platform for parallel and distributed computing
;Marjan Gusev;Sasko Ristov;Goran Velkoski;Bisera Ivanovska
Vol. 9 , No. 2 , pp. 17-21
343 views DOI Abstract
2012
designing the online collaborative learning using the wikispaces
;Dwi Sulisworo
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 58-61
315 views DOI Abstract
2008
learning with social semantic technologies - exploiting latest tools
;Gisela Granitzer;Klaus Tochtermann;Patrick Hoefler
Vol. 3 , No. SI3: ICL2008 , pp. 40-45
309 views DOI Abstract
2001
Sobre la distribución geográfica de Melanophryniscus s. stelzneri (Weyenbergh) (Anura: Bufonidae)
R., Cabrera, Mario;
Vol. 15 , No. 2 , pp. 137-139
299 views
2018
computer english speech independent evaluation system of the fusion discrimination training algorithm
;Yu Ping Jin
Vol. 13 , No. 03 , pp. 180-187
125 views DOI Abstract
2018
influence factors of satisfaction with mobile learning app: an empirical analysis of china
;Liqiong Liu;Liyi Zhang;Pinghao Ye;Qihua Liu
Vol. 13 , No. 03 , pp. 87-99
381 views DOI Abstract
2015
empirical study on the application of call in writing classroom
;Fenglong Cao
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. 74-78
123 views DOI Abstract
2015
prediction of student dropout in e-learning program through the use of machine learning method
;Mingjie Tan;Peiji Shao
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. 11-17
226 views DOI Abstract
2014
teaching model innovation of production operation management engaging in erp sandbox simulation
;Tinggui Chen
Vol. 9 , No. 3 , pp. 59-63
108 views DOI Abstract
2014
measures to promote practice of quiz and evaluation thereof in blended-learning
;Hiroh Yamamoto;Minoru Nakayama;Yasutaka Shimizu
Vol. 9 , No. 5 , pp. 32-39
29 views DOI Abstract
2014
enhancing the interoperability of multimedia learning objects based on the ontology mapping
;Jihad Chaker;Mohamed Khaldi;Souhaib Aammou
Vol. 9 , No. 5 , pp. 40-44
218 views DOI Abstract
2014
flash-based platform for teaching stored program-controlled switching courses
;Kurban Ubul
Vol. 9 , No. 4 , pp. 14-19
208 views DOI Abstract
2014
managing cscl activity through networking models
;Luis Casillas;Thanasis Daradoumis;Santi Caballé
Vol. 9 , No. 7 , pp. 56-63
187 views DOI Abstract
2014
social media: an optimal virtual environment for learning foreign languages
;Rdouan Faizi;Abdellatif El Afia;Raddouane Chiheb
Vol. 9 , No. 5 , pp. 64-66
204 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
33.5/100 · Poor
Ranked #11,705 of 29,298 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

33.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

5.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

67.7/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.