climate dynamics | Journament

Journal Ranking

#9322 / 33,982
📉 Poor
Overall Score
35.3/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 month ago

climate dynamics

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name clim dyn
Abbreviated Name climate dynamics
ISSN 0930-7575
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (21 total)

2019
Potential impacts of Arctic warming on Northern Hemisphere mid-latitude aerosol optical depth
Chen, Y.
Vol. 53 , pp. 1637-1651
352 views DOI
2019
Decadal evolution of the surface energy budget during the fast warming and global warming hiatus periods in the ERA-interim.
Hu, Xiaoming;Sejas, Sergio A;Cai, Ming;Taylor, Patrick C;Deng, Yi;Yang, Song;
Vol. 52 , No. 3-4 , pp. 2005-2016
318 views DOI Abstract
2019
The salience of nonlinearities in the boreal winter response to ENSO: Arctic stratosphere and Europe.
Weinberger, Israel;Garfinkel, Chaim I;White, Ian P;Oman, Luke D;
Vol. 53 , No. 7 , pp. 4591-4610
307 views DOI Abstract
2012
profil distribusi lemak tubuh dan lemak darah dewasa gemuk di perdesaan dan perkotaan
;Fitrah Emawati;Muherdiyantiningsih Muherdiyantiningsih;Rustan Effendi;Susilowati Herman
Vol. 27 , No. 1 , pp. -
267 views DOI Abstract
2012
keragaan pengetahuan gizi dan pengetahuan praktek pemberian makanan bayi dan anak dari ibu dengan balita gizi buruk di daerah bogor dan sekitarnya
;Hermina Hermina
, pp. -
250 views DOI Abstract
2021
Uncertainty of ENSO-amplitude projections in CMIP5 and CMIP6 models
Goratz Beobide-Arsuaga;Tobias Bayr;Annika Reintges;Mojib Latif;
Vol. 56 , No. 11-12 , pp. -
235 views DOI Abstract
2012
peningkatan status gizi anak balita di lingkungan keluarga pekerja wanita
;M. Saidin;Sukati Sukati;Sri Muljati
, pp. -
211 views DOI Abstract
2012
pengaruh ketebalan substrat pada fermentasi tempe terhadap kadar vitamin b1 (the influence of substrate thickness during tempe fermentation on vitamins b1 level)
;Fifi Retiaty;Nia Kurniawati;Komari Komari
Vol. 35 , No. 2 , pp. 182-188
203 views DOI Abstract
2012
pengaruh berbagai faktor terhadap timbulnya cemaran aflatoksin jagung di tingkat rumah tangga dan tingkat pemasaran
;Moecherdiyatiningsih Moecherdiyatiningsih;Sukati Saidin;Muhilal Muhilal
, pp. -
180 views DOI Abstract
2021
Diverse influences of spring Arctic Oscillation on the following winter El Niño-Southern Oscillation in CMIP5 models
Yuqiong Zheng;Shangfeng Chen;Wen Chen;Bin Yu;
, pp. -
167 views DOI Abstract
View All 21 Articles
35
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

35.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.