European journal of clinical nutrition | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1649 / 33,968
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.5/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
33
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

European journal of clinical nutrition

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name Eur J Clin Nutr
Abbreviated Name european journal of clinical nutrition
ISSN 1476-5640
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.nature.com/ejcn
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (19 total)

2000
Undernutrition in relation to childhood infections: a prospective study in the Sudan
Kossmann J;Nestel P;Herrera MG;El Amin A;Fawzi WW;;
Vol. 54 , No. 6 , pp. -
404 views Abstract
2000
Undernutrition in relation to childhood infections: a prospective study in the Sudan
J Kossmann;P Nestel;MG Herrera;AEl Amin;WW Fawzi;J Kossmann;P Nestel;MG Herrera;AEl Amin;WW Fawzi;
Vol. 54 , No. 6 , pp. 463-472
376 views DOI Abstract
2020
"HEALTH-FOR": a pilot study to assess eating habits during pregnancy among Arab and Chinese immigrants living in Italy.
Massari, Maddalena;Mastrolia, Salvatore Andrea;Berti, Cristiana;Cozzolino, Mauro;Aldinucci, Martina;Di Tommaso, Mariarosaria;Nazzaro, Giovanni;Locci, Mariavittoria;Cetin, Irene;
362 views DOI Abstract
1996
Effects of Bifidobacterium sp fermented milk ingested with or without inulin on colonic bifidobacteria and enzymatic activities in healthy humans
Bouhnik Y;Flourie B;Andrieux C;Bisetti N;Briet F;Rambaud JC;;
Vol. 50 , No. 4 , pp. -
357 views Abstract
2019
The economic case for prevention of population vitamin D deficiency: a modelling study using data from England and Wales.
Aguiar, M;Andronis, L;Pallan, M;Högler, W;Frew, E;
346 views DOI Abstract
2001
Complementary feeding practices and dietary intakes from complementary foods amongst weanlings in rural Malawi
Hotz, C;Gibson, RS;
Vol. 55 , No. 1 , pp. 841-849
341 views DOI
2019
Maternal glycemic index and glycemic load in pregnancy and offspring metabolic health in childhood and adolescence—a cohort study of 68,471 mother–offspring dyads from the Danish National Birth Cohort
Maslova, E.
Vol. 73 , pp. 1049-1062
330 views DOI
2011
Dietary sources and sociodemographic and economic factors affecting vitamin D and calcium intakes in Flemish preschoolers.
Huybrechts, I;Lin, Y;De Keyzer, W;Sioen, I;Mouratidou, T;Moreno, L A;Slimani, N;Jenab, M;Vandevijvere, S;De Backer, G;De Henauw, S;
Vol. 65 , No. 9 , pp. 1039-47
303 views DOI Abstract
2019
Higher fish consumption and lower risk of central nervous system demyelination.
Black, Lucinda J;Zhao, Yun;Peng, Yee Cheng;Sherriff, Jill L;Lucas, Robyn M;van der Mei, Ingrid;, ;Pereira, Gavin;
284 views DOI Abstract
2006
Cardiorespiratory fitness and abdominal adiposity in youth
Sojung Lee,Silva Arslanian;Sojung Lee;Silva Arslanian;
Vol. 61 , No. 4 , pp. 561-565
284 views DOI Abstract
View All 19 Articles
42
Overall
Below Average
30
35
30
40
33
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.5/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

32.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.