Indexed in Journament

journal of microbiology, biotechnology and food sciences

EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
31.4 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #15,901 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
19 Articles
Scores higher than 45.7% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name journal of microbiology, biotechnology and food sciences
Abbreviated Name journal of microbiology, biotechnology and food sciences

Quality Profile

5 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 31.0
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 40.5
Community Impact 5.7
Content Distribution 71.1
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

7 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 5 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.0 30.4
Accessibility — 20.4
Timeliness 0.0 5.8
Diversity — 24.4
Innovation 40.5 25.7
Community Impact 5.7 5.8
Content Distribution 71.1 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (19)

2007
lexical knowledge in instructed language learning: the effects of age and exposure
;Inmaculada Miralpeix
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. 61-84
342 views DOI Abstract
2003
some anger metaphors in spanish and english. a contrastive review
;Cristina Soriano
Vol. 3 , No. 2 , pp. 107-122
331 views DOI Abstract
2018
Comparing the physico-chemical characteristics and sensory attributes of imported Brazilian beef meat and imported Indian buffalo meat
Hassan, M.
Vol. 8 , pp. 672-677
315 views DOI
2014
POTENTIAL IN VITRO ANTI-HELICOBACTER ACTIVITY OF BACTERIOCIN AND BACTERIOCIN-LIKE COMPOUNDS PRODUCED BY LACTOBACILLI
Ramadan, Mohammed A.;Megahed, Salwa A.;Eltaweel, Karim M.;Yassin, Aymen S.;
Vol. vol. 4 , No. no. 2 , pp. 160-163
313 views Abstract
2003
and she's like it 's terrible, like: spoken discourse, grammar and corpus analysis
;Svenja Adolphs;Ronald Carter
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 45-56
306 views DOI Abstract
2007
the role of context in word meaning construction: a case study
;Maria Dolores Porto Requejo
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 169-179
288 views DOI Abstract
2009
the inner voice
;Anthony James Ridgway
Vol. 9 , No. 2 , pp. -
285 views DOI Abstract
2008
exploring state-of-the-art software for forensic authorship identification
;Victoria Guillén Nieto;Chelo Vargas Sierra;María Pardiño Juan;Patricio Martínez Barco;Armando Suárez Cueto
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 1-28
277 views DOI Abstract
2018
Characterization of an antimicrobial and antioxidant compound from a marine bacterium Gsa10 associated with the sponge Halichondria Glabrata
Phadale, R.
Vol. 7 , pp. 651-658
276 views DOI
2011
a patient’s tale of incarceration in a victorian lunatic asylum
;Carol Berkencotter
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 1-14
271 views DOI Abstract
2018
Characterization of an antimicrobial and antioxidant compound from a marine bacterium Gsa10 associated with the sponge Halichondria Glabrata
Phadale, R.
Vol. 7 , pp. 651-658
276 views DOI
2018
Comparing the physico-chemical characteristics and sensory attributes of imported Brazilian beef meat and imported Indian buffalo meat
Hassan, M.
Vol. 8 , pp. 672-677
315 views DOI
2014
POTENTIAL IN VITRO ANTI-HELICOBACTER ACTIVITY OF BACTERIOCIN AND BACTERIOCIN-LIKE COMPOUNDS PRODUCED BY LACTOBACILLI
Ramadan, Mohammed A.;Megahed, Salwa A.;Eltaweel, Karim M.;Yassin, Aymen S.;
Vol. vol. 4 , No. no. 2 , pp. 160-163
313 views Abstract
2013
PRODUCTION OF AN EXTRACELLULAR CELLOBIASE IN SOLID STATE FERMENTATION
Agrawal, Ruchi;Satlewal, Alok;Verma, A. K.;
Vol. 2 , No. 4 , pp. 2339-2350
94 views Abstract
2011
a patient’s tale of incarceration in a victorian lunatic asylum
;Carol Berkencotter
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 1-14
271 views DOI Abstract
2010
the two faces of sla: mental representation and skill
;Bill Van Patten
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. 1-18
266 views DOI Abstract
2009
towards a corpus-based analysis of anglicisms in spanish: a case study
;José L. Oncins-Martínez
Vol. 9 , No. 3 , pp. 115-132
169 views DOI Abstract
2009
the inner voice
;Anthony James Ridgway
Vol. 9 , No. 2 , pp. -
285 views DOI Abstract
2009
english language teaching in spain: do textbooks comply with the official methodological regulations? a sample analysis
;Aquilino Sánchez;Raquel Criado
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. -
182 views DOI Abstract
2008
a state-of-the-art review of the real-time computer-aided study of the writing process
;Muhammad M. Abdel Latif
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 29-50
165 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
31.4/100 · Poor
Ranked #15,901 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

31.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

5.7/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

71.1/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.