journal of microbiology, biotechnology and food sciences | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2205 / 33,952
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.1/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 days ago

journal of microbiology, biotechnology and food sciences

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus doaj
Short Name journal of microbiology, biotechnology and food sciences
Abbreviated Name journal of microbiology, biotechnology and food sciences
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (19 total)

2003
some anger metaphors in spanish and english. a contrastive review
;Cristina Soriano
Vol. 3 , No. 2 , pp. 107-122
281 views DOI Abstract
2018
Comparing the physico-chemical characteristics and sensory attributes of imported Brazilian beef meat and imported Indian buffalo meat
Hassan, M.
Vol. 8 , pp. 672-677
276 views DOI
2007
lexical knowledge in instructed language learning: the effects of age and exposure
;Inmaculada Miralpeix
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. 61-84
268 views DOI Abstract
2014
POTENTIAL IN VITRO ANTI-HELICOBACTER ACTIVITY OF BACTERIOCIN AND BACTERIOCIN-LIKE COMPOUNDS PRODUCED BY LACTOBACILLI
Ramadan, Mohammed A.;Megahed, Salwa A.;Eltaweel, Karim M.;Yassin, Aymen S.;
Vol. vol. 4 , No. no. 2 , pp. 160-163
263 views Abstract
2003
and she's like it 's terrible, like: spoken discourse, grammar and corpus analysis
;Svenja Adolphs;Ronald Carter
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 45-56
255 views DOI Abstract
2009
the inner voice
;Anthony James Ridgway
Vol. 9 , No. 2 , pp. -
237 views DOI Abstract
2011
a patient’s tale of incarceration in a victorian lunatic asylum
;Carol Berkencotter
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 1-14
231 views DOI Abstract
2007
the role of context in word meaning construction: a case study
;Maria Dolores Porto Requejo
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 169-179
231 views DOI Abstract
2018
Characterization of an antimicrobial and antioxidant compound from a marine bacterium Gsa10 associated with the sponge Halichondria Glabrata
Phadale, R.
Vol. 7 , pp. 651-658
227 views DOI
2008
exploring state-of-the-art software for forensic authorship identification
;Victoria Guillén Nieto;Chelo Vargas Sierra;María Pardiño Juan;Patricio Martínez Barco;Armando Suárez Cueto
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 1-28
219 views DOI Abstract
View All 19 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.