Indexed in Journament

journal of microbiology, biotechnology and food sciences

EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
39.1/100
Journament Score
#9,626
Journament Rank
19
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name journal of microbiology, biotechnology and food sciences
Abbreviated Name journal of microbiology, biotechnology and food sciences

Indexings

scopus doaj

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (19)

2007
lexical knowledge in instructed language learning: the effects of age and exposure
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. 61-84
316 views DOI Abstract
2003
some anger metaphors in spanish and english. a contrastive review
Vol. 3 , No. 2 , pp. 107-122
309 views DOI Abstract
2014
POTENTIAL IN VITRO ANTI-HELICOBACTER ACTIVITY OF BACTERIOCIN AND BACTERIOCIN-LIKE COMPOUNDS PRODUCED BY LACTOBACILLI
Vol. vol. 4 , No. no. 2 , pp. 160-163
294 views Abstract
2003
and she's like it 's terrible, like: spoken discourse, grammar and corpus analysis
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 45-56
289 views DOI Abstract
2007
the role of context in word meaning construction: a case study
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 169-179
267 views DOI Abstract
2009
the inner voice
Vol. 9 , No. 2 , pp. -
265 views DOI Abstract
2011
a patient’s tale of incarceration in a victorian lunatic asylum
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 1-14
260 views DOI Abstract
2008
exploring state-of-the-art software for forensic authorship identification
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 1-28
260 views DOI Abstract
2014
POTENTIAL IN VITRO ANTI-HELICOBACTER ACTIVITY OF BACTERIOCIN AND BACTERIOCIN-LIKE COMPOUNDS PRODUCED BY LACTOBACILLI
Vol. vol. 4 , No. no. 2 , pp. 160-163
294 views Abstract
2013
PRODUCTION OF AN EXTRACELLULAR CELLOBIASE IN SOLID STATE FERMENTATION
Vol. 2 , No. 4 , pp. 2339-2350
77 views Abstract
2011
a patient’s tale of incarceration in a victorian lunatic asylum
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 1-14
260 views DOI Abstract
2010
the two faces of sla: mental representation and skill
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. 1-18
235 views DOI Abstract
2009
towards a corpus-based analysis of anglicisms in spanish: a case study
Vol. 9 , No. 3 , pp. 115-132
150 views DOI Abstract
2009
the inner voice
Vol. 9 , No. 2 , pp. -
265 views DOI Abstract
2009
2008
a state-of-the-art review of the real-time computer-aided study of the writing process
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 29-50
149 views DOI Abstract
39
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

39.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.