Indexed in Journament

learning and instruction

ISSN 0959-4752· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
35.3 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #11,230 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
39 Articles
Scores higher than 61.6% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name learning and instruction
Abbreviated Name learning and instruction
ISSN 0959-4752
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/learning-and-instruction

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.4 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 20.4
Timeliness 20.0 5.8
Diversity 83.3 24.4
Innovation 6.0 25.7
Community Impact 2.9 5.8
Content Distribution 67.3 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (39)

2019
Achievement gap: Socioeconomic status affects reading development beyond language and cognition in children facing poverty
Dolean, D.
Vol. 63 , pp. 0-0
446 views DOI
2019
Understanding the progress in mathematics of Chinese adolescents: Significant impacts from the socioeconomic status and the academic expectations of primary caregivers
Zha, M.
Vol. 64 , pp. 0-0
359 views DOI
2011
una parcela en la contabilidad-fiscalidad en españa: ¿la utilidad de las normas de actualización y regularización de balances: 1961-1996?
;María del Carmen Cámara Barroso;Macario Cámara de la Fuente
Vol. 8 , No. 15 , pp. 75-106
359 views DOI Abstract
2020
Teachers’ belief that math requires innate ability predicts lower intrinsic motivation among low-achieving students
Heyder, A.
Vol. 65 , pp. 0-0
303 views DOI
2012
regulación contable del sector ferroviario español en el primer cuarto del siglo xx (1900-1925)
;José Luis Montoya Chinchilla;Isidoro Guzmán Raja;Isidoro Guzmán Raja
Vol. 9 , No. 17 , pp. -
287 views DOI Abstract
2006
el patrimonio de la armada española en la sociedad de la información y el conocimiento. el archivo naval de cartagena
;Esteban Hernández Esteve
Vol. 3 , No. 5 , pp. 234-260
286 views DOI Abstract
2016
relação dos primeiros contabilistas formados em portugal por via institucional (1759-1763: aula do comércio de lisboa)
;Miguel Gonçalves
Vol. 13 , No. 25 , pp. 91-111
284 views DOI Abstract
2013
la función de la contabilidad. una perspectiva socio-fenomenológica
;Jairo Emiro Cuenú Cabezas
Vol. 10 , No. 18 , pp. -
277 views DOI Abstract
2017
fallecimiento de josé maría gonzález ferrando, decano de los actuales estudiosos de historia de la contabilidad en españa
;Esteban Hernández Esteve
Vol. 13 , No. 25 , pp. 170-172
274 views DOI Abstract
2006
la actividad financiera del monasterio de silos en el siglo xviii a la luz de sus libros de cuentas
;María Begoña Prieto;Lorenzo Maté;Jorge Tua Pereda
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 97-141
274 views DOI Abstract
2023
Pizzas or no pizzas: An advantage of word problems in fraction arithmetic?
Mostert, T.M.M.
Vol. 86 , pp. 0-0
83 views DOI
2022
Task ambiguity and academic procrastination: An experience sampling approach
Wieland, L.M.
Vol. 81 , pp. 0-0
188 views DOI
2021
How to understand what you don't believe: Metacognitive training prevents belief-biases in multiple text comprehension
Abendroth, J.
Vol. 71 , pp. 0-0
188 views DOI
2021
Does what you get depend on who you are with? Effects of student composition on teaching quality
Fauth, B.
Vol. 71 , pp. 0-0
99 views DOI
2020
Gendered pathways from academic performance, motivational beliefs, and school burnout to adolescents’ educational and occupational aspirations
Widlund, A.
Vol. 66 , pp. 0-0
186 views DOI
2020
Researching and writing based on multiple texts
Du, H.
Vol. 66 , pp. 0-0
22 views DOI
2020
Improving sleep, cognitive functioning and academic performance with sleep education at school in children
Rey, A.
Vol. 65 , pp. 0-0
237 views DOI
2020
Teachers’ belief that math requires innate ability predicts lower intrinsic motivation among low-achieving students
Heyder, A.
Vol. 65 , pp. 0-0
303 views DOI
2019
Text difficulty, topic interest, and mind wandering during reading
Soemer, A.
Vol. 61 , pp. 12-22
171 views DOI
2019
Does restricting hand gestures impair mathematical reasoning?
Walkington, C.
Vol. 64 , pp. 0-0
196 views DOI
Journament Score
35.3/100 · Poor
Ranked #11,230 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

35.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

83.3/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

6.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

2.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

20.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

67.3/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.