learning and instruction | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1801 / 33,956
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

learning and instruction

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ulakbim soc
Short Name learning and instruction
Abbreviated Name learning and instruction
ISSN 0959-4752
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/learning-and-instruction
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (39 total)

2019
Achievement gap: Socioeconomic status affects reading development beyond language and cognition in children facing poverty
Dolean, D.
Vol. 63 , pp. 0-0
403 views DOI
2019
Understanding the progress in mathematics of Chinese adolescents: Significant impacts from the socioeconomic status and the academic expectations of primary caregivers
Zha, M.
Vol. 64 , pp. 0-0
327 views DOI
2011
una parcela en la contabilidad-fiscalidad en españa: ¿la utilidad de las normas de actualización y regularización de balances: 1961-1996?
;María del Carmen Cámara Barroso;Macario Cámara de la Fuente
Vol. 8 , No. 15 , pp. 75-106
287 views DOI Abstract
2020
Teachers’ belief that math requires innate ability predicts lower intrinsic motivation among low-achieving students
Heyder, A.
Vol. 65 , pp. 0-0
264 views DOI
2006
el patrimonio de la armada española en la sociedad de la información y el conocimiento. el archivo naval de cartagena
;Esteban Hernández Esteve
Vol. 3 , No. 5 , pp. 234-260
244 views DOI Abstract
2016
relação dos primeiros contabilistas formados em portugal por via institucional (1759-1763: aula do comércio de lisboa)
;Miguel Gonçalves
Vol. 13 , No. 25 , pp. 91-111
241 views DOI Abstract
2017
fallecimiento de josé maría gonzález ferrando, decano de los actuales estudiosos de historia de la contabilidad en españa
;Esteban Hernández Esteve
Vol. 13 , No. 25 , pp. 170-172
237 views DOI Abstract
2012
regulación contable del sector ferroviario español en el primer cuarto del siglo xx (1900-1925)
;José Luis Montoya Chinchilla;Isidoro Guzmán Raja;Isidoro Guzmán Raja
Vol. 9 , No. 17 , pp. -
235 views DOI Abstract
2006
la actividad financiera del monasterio de silos en el siglo xviii a la luz de sus libros de cuentas
;María Begoña Prieto;Lorenzo Maté;Jorge Tua Pereda
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 97-141
228 views DOI Abstract
2015
una historia de dos fábricas de cerveza, una ciudad, una depresión y un régimen nacional socialista- basado en los estados contables y el informe del órgano de gestión
;Carmen Martínez Franco;Martin Quinn
Vol. 12 , No. 22 , pp. 66-80
225 views DOI Abstract
View All 39 Articles
41
Overall
Below Average
30
35
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.7/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.