gateways : international journal of community research & engagement | Journament

Journal Ranking

#4910 / 33,968
📉 Poor
Overall Score
37.5/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

gateways : international journal of community research & engagement

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
doaj
Short Name gateways : international journal of community research & engagement
Abbreviated Name gateways : international journal of community research & engagement
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (16 total)

2014
The Article Idea Chart: A participatory action research tool to aid involvement in dissemination
Forchuk, Cheryl;Meier, Amanda;
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. -
369 views Abstract
2014
heat transfer augmentation using nanofluids in an elliptic annulus with constant heat flux boundary condition
;H.K. Dawood;H.A. Mohammed;K.M. Munisamy
Vol. 4 , No. C , pp. 32-41
323 views DOI Abstract
2015
prototype implementation and experimental analysis of water heating using recovered waste heat of chimneys
;Mahmoud Khaled;Mohamad Ramadan;Khaled Chahine;Ali Assi
Vol. 5 , No. C , pp. 127-133
279 views DOI Abstract
2018
overall performance optimization of a spiral pipe type heater by fluid- structure interaction modeling and partitioning screening method
;Lei Guo;Guofeng Li;Yu Liu;Ganqing Zhang;Zechao Wu
Vol. 11 , No. C , pp. 89-97
270 views DOI Abstract
2017
natural convective heat transfer in a walled ccpc with pv cell
;W. Li;M.C. Paul;N. Sellami;T.K. Mallick;A.R. Knox
Vol. 10 , No. C , pp. 499-516
260 views DOI Abstract
2017
effect of the thermal insulation layer location on wall dynamic thermal response rate under the air-conditioning intermittent operation
;Lili Zhang;Tao Luo;Xi Meng;Yating Wang;Chaoping Hou;Enshen Long
Vol. 10 , No. C , pp. 79-85
249 views DOI Abstract
2016
heat transfer enhancement in tubular heat exchanger with double v-ribbed twisted-tapes
;Sombat Tamna;Yingyong Kaewkohkiat;Sompol Skullong;Pongjet Promvonge
Vol. 7 , No. C , pp. 14-24
242 views DOI Abstract
2018
improving the passive building energy efficiency through numerical simulation–a case study for tetouan climate in northern of morocco
;Meriem Lebied;Friedrich Sick;Zakaria Choulli;Abdelmajid El Bouardi
Vol. 11 , No. C , pp. 125-134
237 views DOI Abstract
2015
thermal and optical efficiency investigation of a parabolic trough collector
;C. Tzivanidis;E. Bellos;D. Korres;K.A. Antonopoulos;G. Mitsopoulos
Vol. 6 , No. C , pp. 226-237
237 views DOI Abstract
2016
second law evaluation of a lightweight cooling unit
;Guilherme B. Ribeiro
Vol. 7 , No. C , pp. 47-54
218 views DOI Abstract
View All 16 Articles
37
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.